查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 詩畫互動下的個人生命與文化徵象--王白淵及其《荊棘之道》的跨藝術再現
- 藝術形式轉換與符號之過渡--談「一千零一夜」框架敘事手法之再現
- 漫遊者巡弋的空間詩意--取王白淵《荊棘之道》抽樣為例
- 王白淵與日本大正詩壇的交會--論《荊棘之道》詩作對於野口米次郎文學的接受
- 一個搖滾神話的建構與解構--一九九○年代的Jim Morrison再現與詮釋循環
- 臺灣原住民還我土地運動之媒體再現
- 合金鐵化學成份X-射線螢光分析法之建立
- 影像傳輸在平版印花之應用黑圖繪製再現性之分析
- CTP版材之間和PS版材的網點再現度之製程能力比較
- 平面著作在三度空間「單純性質再現」之保護--最高法院八十六年度臺上字第五二二五號刑事判決評介
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 詩畫互動下的個人生命與文化徵象--王白淵及其《荊棘之道》的跨藝術再現=The Life and Cultural Phenomenon under the Interaction of Poetry and Paintings: Bei-Yuan Wang and the Cross-Art Reappearance of "The Road of Thorns" |
---|---|
作者姓名(中文) | 王文仁; | 書刊名 | 東華漢學 |
卷期 | 12 2010.12[民99.12] |
頁次 | 頁245-276 |
分類號 | 848 |
關鍵詞 | 王白淵; 荊棘之道; 跨藝術; 再現; Bei-Yuan Wang; The Road of Thorns; Cross-art; Reappearance; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 1931年6月,臺人王白淵(1902-1965)在日本出版個人首冊詩文集《蕀の道》。他在其中所形塑而成與現實對立的藝術世界―一個虛擬的烏托邦―與其早年所經歷的一段「從美術到文學」的變化歷程,實有著密不可分的關係。1923年前進東京的王氏,原本要圓的是一個「臺灣密列」的藝術美夢,卻在日本畫壇的陳腐與殖民體制對臺人的壓迫下,轉而以詩的形式思索、傳遞民眾感情與藝術真理。透過對泰戈爾、米勒、梵谷、盧梭、高更等人影響的接受,王氏以詩代畫構築出一個充斥著原始祥和氛圍,天地物我交融,生命奧義追求的藝術世界。顯現了個人不妥協於現實的藝術家生命的思考,以及1920、30年代臺灣知識份子所面對殘缺、挫折與無以發展的時代困境。 |
英文摘要 | In June, 1931, the Taiwanese Bei-Yuan Wang (1902-1965) published his first personal poetry anthology in Japan, called The Road of Thorns, where he built an art world, a fictitious Utopia, contrasting to the reality. The creation has much to do with his prior experience, the transference 'from art to literature.' Wang came to Tokyo in 1923, originally intending to fulfill an artist dream to become 'the Millet of Taiwan,' but due to the staleness of Japanese Art and the suppression of Taiwanese people under the colonized system at the time, Wang began to think and deliver human emotions and the truth of art through poems. By integrating the influence from Tagore, Millet, Van Gogh, Rousseau, and Gauguin, Wang used poems in replace of paintings and established an art world filled with peace, happiness, fusion, and meanings of life. His poetry revealed the thinking of an artist who did not want to compromise with the reality and the difficulty with the lost, frustration, and hopeless which the intellectuals in 1920s and 1930s were facing. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。