查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 感「史」不遇的歷史情節--論徐復觀的《論史記》
- 歷史敘述與近代英國史學傳統的轉變(1880-1930)
- The Philosophical Argumentation by Historical Narration in Sung China: The Case of Chu Hsi
- 史學之體用--槐聚說史闡論之一
- 論二十世紀西方歷史敘述研究的兩個階段
- К характеристике фрагмента китайской языковой картины мира растительное царство в сопоставительном аспекте
- 公共藝術設置內容之研究
- 女性欲望與男性權威的建構--張資平戀愛小說的敘事模式及其文化闡釋
- 影視史學相關問題之討論
- 評《史元--十九世紀歐洲的歷史意象》
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 感「史」不遇的歷史情節--論徐復觀的《論史記》=The Sigh of the Historical Circumstances that couldn't Be Touched-- To Discuss the "Reviewing Shi Ji by Fu-gua Xu" |
---|---|
作 者 | 洪喬平; | 書刊名 | 應華學報 |
卷 期 | 8 2010.12[民99.12] |
頁 次 | 頁1-24 |
分類號 | 601.4 |
關鍵詞 | 新歷史主義; 敘事模式; 歷史情節; 文化內涵; 審美價值; 歷史敘述; 歷史真相; New historical narrative; Mode aesthetic value of the historical; Circumstances of historical narrative; Cultural content of historical truth; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本論文是透過美國新歷史主義批評的方法來探討徐復觀所著《論史記》一文。美國新歷史主義認為我們現在所接觸的歷史都是屬於歷史文本,而那些記錄歷史的歷史專著只是歷史敘述。歷史文本或歷史敘述距離歷史真相或歷史事實是有一段距離的,形成這種現象的主要原因是歷史撰述者的個人主觀介入所造成;所以每一種歷史敘述都包括濃厚的個人色彩。徐復觀的《論史記》筆者可以大膽地說,不是探討歷史的真相或探討歷史的敘述,而是較偏重於個人情感的介入與抒發,這當中的關鍵點是「不遇」情節。也因此本文嘗試從這個角度,運用美國新歷史主義批評的方法,將太史公的《史記》與徐復觀的《論史記》兩者形成互為文本,來探討這一段感「史」不遇的歷史情節。感「史」不遇的歷史情節是由精神風骨、審美價值、文化內涵等三大主軸所組成,太史公的《史記》是歷史敘述也是文本敘述的文本,而徐復觀的《論史記》是歷史評述也是歷史哲學的文本,他們兩者之聞雖然相距兩千多年,但是如果沒有相互心靈的對應感動,是無法產生如此相連的歷史情節的。 |
英文摘要 | This paper try to use the United States approach of New Historicism to explore the Fu-guan's book, ”Reviewing Shi Ji.” American New Historicism thinks that the history we are now contact with belongs to the historical text. Those who record history monograph is historical narrative history. There is still a distance in Historical text, historical narrative from the historical truth, and historical fact. This phenomenon is mainly due to the formation of the compilation of the history involved in personal subjective. Therefore, every kind of historical narrative includes a strong personal touch. Fu-guan's ”On the Historical Records,” I dare say that it is not only investigating the truth of history and historical narratives, but emphasizing on the involvement and expressing personal feelings. However, the key point is that” the historical circumstances couldn't be touched ”So this essay tries to follow this angle to do comparison between ”Shi Ji” and ”Reviewing Shi Ji” to discuss the historical circumstances and elements. The elements are composed of three main axis-spiritual strength of character, aesthetic value, cultural connotation. ”Shi Ji” is not only historical narrative but also described in the text of the text. ”Reviewing Shi Ji” is a historical review of the text and also a philosophy of history. Although the time between two books is two thousand years, without touching each other heart, it is impossible to produce such a plot linked to the history. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。