查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 歷史敘述與近代英國史學傳統的轉變(1880-1930)
- 歷史與退化:論鳥與鳥籠
- On the Transformation of Historical Thinking in Modern China
- 近代西方史學思潮變遷(1830-1980)
- 英國史家湯姆森夫婦的史學和社會思想
- 漢晉間史學思想變遷的痕跡--以列傳和別傳為範圍所作的討論
- 維柯與章學誠史學思想之比較
- 明末清初天主教傳華研究的回顧與展望
- 趙翼經世致用的史學思想研究
- The Philosophical Argumentation by Historical Narration in Sung China: The Case of Chu Hsi
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 歷史敘述與近代英國史學傳統的轉變(1880-1930)=Historical Narrative and the Transition of Modern British Historiography, 1880-1930 |
---|---|
作 者 | 周樑楷; | 書刊名 | 興大歷史學報 |
卷 期 | 8 1998.06[民87.06] |
頁 次 | 頁271-285 |
分類號 | 601.9 |
關鍵詞 | 史學史; 史學思想; 歷史敘述; 柏里; 崔衛林; Historigraphy; Historical thought; Historical narrative; J.B.Bury. G. Trevelyan; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
英文摘要 | This critique that focuses on the historical thinking of J.B. Bury and George Trevelyan intends to explore the historical narrative and the transition of modern British historiography between 1880 and 1930. Bury is influential in the analytical history and the history-as-science school, and Trevelyan, “the last Whig historian”, is the representative of the history-as-art school. Their debates on historical methods and writings appear to be a significant conflict between scientific history and literary history, and a combat between analytical history and narrative history. With my further study and research on this topic, however, I find this dichotomy confusing in understanding and interpreting Bury's and Trevelyan's ideas and their relationships. Therefore, by emphasizing on cognitive history and analytical history, this essay explores the transition of British history and explains how this traditional historical narrative declined in the academia. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。