頁籤選單縮合
題名 | Scholasticism, Dialogue and Universalism=對話、士林哲學與普遍性 |
---|---|
作者 | 魏明德; | 書刊名 | 哲學與文化 |
卷期 | 37:11=438 2010.11[民99.11] |
頁次 | 頁23-40 |
專輯 | 士林哲學在中國 |
分類號 | 142.2 |
關鍵詞 | 士林哲學; 對話; 對話風格; 溝通; 靈修神學; 生命形式; 語言遊戲; 普遍性; Scholastic philosophy; Dialogue; Dialogic styles; Communication; Spiritual theology; Forms of life; Language-game; Universality; |
語文 | 英文(English) |
中文摘要 | 「士林哲學」指的是西方中世紀哲學,廣義而言,基本上指在學校或經院中進行,是以一定的文集為中心,並以論證方法來探索其資源的哲學體系,都可稱之為士林哲學。本文開頭先簡述康德對所有經院式哲學的批評,並兼及中世紀士林哲學所具有、後來又為十七世紀靈修神學的發展重塑並豐化的「對話資源」。將士林哲學與靈修神學一併考慮,有助於我們將焦點置於「對話風格」的不同,並認識此種多樣性與語言遊戲所具有的可塑性之間的關聯。在此基礎上,要如何將態樣萬千的哲學對話風格納入一個不斷演進的對談體系,便成了我們當前的哲學任務。 |
英文摘要 | ”Scholasticism” is a term that refers to Western medieval philosophy and, by extension, to any philosophical system primarily relying on a given textual corpus and on an argumentative method for exploiting its resources. At the beginning of this essay, Kant's criticism against all scholastic endeavors is briefly recalled. At the same time, attention is drawn to the ”dialogic resources” of medieval scholastic philosophy, resources that were reworked and enriched through the development of spiritual theology in the 17th century. A joint assessment of scholastic philosophy and spiritual theology helps one to focus on the variety of ”dialogic styles” and to relate such diversity to the plasticity of language-games. On such basis, our current philosophical task may well be to connect philosophical dialogic styles in their irreducible diversity into an ever-evolving conversing body. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。