查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 比較在影像導引放射治療中自動影像導引定位驗證系統和錐狀射束電腦斷層的準確性
- 自體齒移植軟硬組織處理的新手法--使用相似齒縮短自體齒移植手術時間
- 利用影像導引放射治療評估具有侵入管路的頭頸部患者擺位準確性
- 使用錐狀射束電腦斷層與多切面電腦斷層影像進行高解析度凝膠劑量分析
- 錐狀射束電腦斷層掃描分析上顎門齒管與植牙手術之相關性
- 自動追蹤對位治療床在平移軸與旋轉軸參數之殘餘誤差分析
- 自體齒移植合併上顎竇提升術--電腦斷層與電腦輔助擬真模型之應用
- Patient-Specific CBCT Number Corrections for Cone Beam CT-Based Dose Calculations
- 錐形射束電腦斷層之皮膚劑量測量
- 利用影像導引系統比較兩種腹板對直腸癌放射治療準確性之分析
第1筆 /總和 1 筆
/ 1 筆
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 比較在影像導引放射治療中自動影像導引定位驗證系統和錐狀射束電腦斷層的準確性=Comparison of the Setup Accuracy of ExacTrac X-ray System and Cone-beam CT in Image-Guided Radiation Therapy |
---|---|
作者 | 康誠麟; 陳文凱; 蔡正祥; 許順能; 張軒銘; 廖宗義; 阮國榮; | 書刊名 | 中華放射線技術學雜誌 |
卷期 | 34:3 2010.09[民99.09] |
頁次 | 頁195-200 |
分類號 | 416.36 |
關鍵詞 | 自動影像導引定位驗證系統; 錐狀射束電腦斷層; 數位影像重組影像; ExacTrac X-ray system; Cone-beam CT; Digital reconstructed radiographys; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本研究主要利用假體來測量自動影像導引定位驗證系統(ExacTrac X-ray system)和錐狀射束電腦斷層(cone-beam CT, CBCT)的準確性。首先利用假體表面所做的標記將假體設置於等中心點位置,給予一個已知位移,移動距離選定為0 mm、5 mm、10 mm、15 mm。利用自動影像導引定位驗證系統取得兩組斜位的X光影像,和數位影像重組影像(Digital Reconstructed Radiographys, DRR)進行比對,利用比對結果進行位移偏差修正。之後利用相同方法以CBCT掃描取像,再和DRR進行比對計算位移偏差。所有位移偏差測試皆量測三次,比較自動影像導引定位驗證系統和錐狀射束電腦斷層實際測量值和已知位移的準確性差異。自動影像導引定位驗證系統所測得X軸(左右)、Y軸(頭腳)及Z軸(前後)的平均位移及標準差分別為1.43±0.17、1.14±0.32、2.08±1.16 mm。錐狀射束電腦斷層所測得X軸(左右)、Y軸(頭腳)及Z軸(前後)的平均位移及標準差分別為1.16±0.33、0.42±0.10、0.69±0.21 mm。比較二者結果,在Y、Z軸方向的位移具有統計學上的顯著差異。 |
英文摘要 | The study to compare the setup accuracy measured with ExacTrac X-ray system and cone-beam CT (CBCT) for phantom. Firstly, the phantom was initially positioned on the isocenter using the marks on the surface of the phantom. A known translational shift including X (L-R), Y (S-I), and Z (A-P) axes was performed. The translational shift was selected from (0, 5, 10, 15 mm).The phantom was then imaged with two oblique X-ray images using the ExacTrac X-ray system. These two images were automatically registered with corresponding Digital Reconstructed Radiographys (DRR) to calculate a correctional shift. After this, the phantom was scanned with CBCT, and matched with the planning DRRs using image registration to calculate a correctional shift. The above test was repeated for three times with different translational shifts. The comparison of measured vs. known displacements was used to test the accuracy of ExacTrac X-ray system and CBCT. The translational setup discrepancies in mean±SD with ExacTrac X-ray system were 1.43±0.17, 1.14±0.32 and 2.08±1.16 mm in X (L-R), Y (S-I), and Z (A-P) axes, respectively. And the CBCT were 1.16±0.33, 0.42±0.10 and 0.69±0.26 mm in X (L-R), Y (S-I), and Z (A-P) axes, respectively. Statistically significant difference were found on Y (p=0.001), and Z (p=0.001) axes between ExacTrac X-ray system and CBCT. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。