查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- Differentiating Benign and Malignant Soft Tissue Masses by Magnetic Resonance Imaging : Role of Tissue Component Analysis
- Primary Cardiac Tumors: Report of Two Cases
- 睪丸旁平滑肌肉瘤的影像學表徵:病例報告
- Characterization of Adrenal Tumors with Chemical Shift MR Images Using A Phase-array Surface Coil
- MRI Findings of Primary Adenocarcinoma of the Seminal Vesicles: Case Report
- Prostate Cancer: Local Staging with Endorectal magnetic Resonance Imaging
- 攝護腺癌之磁振造影影像和腫瘤定期
- MRI of Primary Malignant Melanoma of Urinary Bladder: A Case Report
- Magnetic Resonance Image Features of Lhermitte-Duclos Disease: A Case Report
- Endometrial Carcinoma: Evaluation of Depth of Myometrial Invasion by MR Imaging-Preliminary Report
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | Differentiating Benign and Malignant Soft Tissue Masses by Magnetic Resonance Imaging : Role of Tissue Component Analysis=以磁振造影區分軟組織腫塊之良惡性 : 組織成分之重要性 |
---|---|
作 者 | 陳俊谷; 吳宏達; 邱宏仁; 韋朝榮; 顏昭璿; 張政彥; 陳威明; | 書刊名 | Journal of the Chinese Medical Association |
卷 期 | 72:4 2009.04[民98.04] |
頁 次 | 頁194-201+CA37 |
關鍵詞 | 磁振造影; 腫瘤; 軟組織腫塊; 組織特性; Magnetic resonance imaging; Neoplasm; Soft tissue masses; Tissue characterization; |
語 文 | 英文(English) |
英文摘要 | Background: There is a variable degree of accuracy in discriminating benign from malignant soft tissue masses based on signal intensity and morphologic characteristics by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The aim of this study was to determine the utility of detailed component pattern assessment, in addition to morphologic study, for differentiating benign from malignant soft tissue masses by MRI. Methods: The imaging features of 118 histologically proven soft tissue masses were analyzed according to: (1) signal characteristics: (a) high T1 matrix; (b) low T2 matrix; (c) fibrous tissue signal; (d) calcification; (e) myxoid signal tissue; (f) fatty signal tissue; (g) cystic signal; (h) necrotic signal; (i) septations; (j) vascular signal void signal; (k) fat rim; and (l) hemorrhage; and according to (2) morphologic assessment: (a) lesion size (maximal diameter) in centimeters (cm); (b) lesion depth in cm; (c) margins; (d) peritumoral edema; (e) bone involvement; (f) marginal capsule or pseudocapsule; and (g) neurovascular bundle involvement. Univariate and multivariate analyses followed by stepwise logistic regression of combination of imaging features were performed. The predictive value of each imaging feature and various combinations of imaging features were determined. Results: In univariate analysis, T2 low signal matrix, fibrous tissue, calcification, necrosis, septum, fat rim sign, peritumoral edema, and hemorrhage showed statistically significant differences between benign and malignant masses (p < 0.05). The positive predictive value of necrosis for malignancy was 84.8%, and its specificity was 90.9%. In multivariate analysis, the best model for predicting malignant masses was the combination of necrosis, maximal mass diameter, peritumoral edema, and absent fibrosis, absent calcification, and lack of fat rim. The combination of these parameters resulted in the most correct diagnoses of malignancy, with a sensitivity of 84.2%, specificity of 64.0%, and accuracy of 74.8%, whereas the accuracy of models consisting of component character and morphologic feature were 74.3% and 70.9%, respectively. Conclusion: MRI is useful in determining whether a soft tissue mass is malignant or not. Traditional morphologic assessment was reinforced by detailed component characterization analysis. The parameters favoring malignancy were large lesion size, peritumoral edema, necrosis, and absent calcification, absent fibrosis, and lack of fat rim. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。