查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
| 題 名 | 專利師考用配合制度初探=Discussion on Patent Attorney Eligibility Examination and the Role of Patent Attorneys in Taiwan |
|---|---|
| 作 者 | 蔡坤財; | 書刊名 | 國家菁英 |
| 卷 期 | 6:3=23 2010.09[民99.09] |
| 頁 次 | 頁91-110 |
| 分類號 | 573.44 |
| 關鍵詞 | 專利師考試; 考用制度; 考用配合; 國家考試; Patent Attorney; Eligibility examination; National Exams; |
| 語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
| 中文摘要 | 專利師工作內容的高度專業性與複雜性,既要能瞭解最新科技發明內容並撰寫說明書,又必須對相關法令有深入的瞭解甚至參與訴訟;專利師國考的目的就是篩選出這類具有雙專長的優秀人才,使各界對專利師考試抱持極高的期待。台灣專利師考試自2008年度起舉行,今年剛完成第3次考試;3年來各界對專利師考試制度與考試內容批評聲浪不斷,究竟現行專利師考試是否符合為國舉才之目的,是否依社會實際需求錄取各領域之人才,從國際角度看是否能跟上時代潮流,實務界現有執業人員的看法又如何,本文嘗試由歷史面向出發,讓大眾一方面認識專利師肩負哪些攸關經濟發展的重責大任,一方面也瞭解到專利師多年來未受重視所產生的歷史包袱;再從智慧財產局申請案件量,與國際比較的角度,用數據說明並檢討現行專利師考試科目及其所佔比重,最後提出具體改革建議,期能對我國專利師考用制度,提供全方位的推動改革參考。 |
| 英文摘要 | The functions of a patent attorney are complicated and require high professionalism. In addition to understanding inventions derived from emerging technology and being capable of drafting patent specifications based on such understanding, a patent attorney must also be acquainted with relevant laws and regulations or even participate in patent litigations. Public intellects from all domains have high expectation of Patent Attorney Eligibility Examination as it is the examination’s purpose to screening out those outstanding talents with the abovesaid dual professional specialties. The Patent Attorney Eligibility Examination of Taiwan was firstly held in 2008 and was held for the third time this year. During the past three years, criticism of the system and subjects of the examination has never stopped. Does the current examination achieve the purpose of identifying talents, or does the talents it screens meet practical demands of the patent community? Does it keep pace with international trend, and how do patent practitioners view the Patent Attorney Eligibility Examination? This paper attempts to guide readers from the historical point of view to take a glance of the responsibility of patent attorneys in terms of economic development, and at the same time readers may understand the historical burden left for patent attorneys after receiving not much attention for decades. The paper will also discuss and evaluate the proportion of the examination subjects by making reference to statistics of the patent applications filed with the Taiwan Intellectual Property Office and by the comparison with other countries. Finally, this paper also gives specific recommendations in the hope that it can provide a reference to a dynamic reform of our Patent Attorney Eligibility Examination system. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。