查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 語行行為與法規範的效力化
- 論國際民事訴訟程序與涉外民事法律適用法第一條之適用
- An Alternative Approach for Administrative Capacity-Building in Developing Countries
- 日本語科ガイド.添乗員免許試験への対策
- 無邦交國家的電匯款返還之訴--國際私法的觀點
- An Analysis of Chinese EFL Learners' Communication Strategies in an English Oral Test--From Interactive and Psycholinguistic Perspectives
- 化學實驗室認證與品質管理系統
- 光華寮案:國家承認、政府承認與國家繼承--平成19年(2007)3月27日最高裁第三小法廷判決.民集61卷2號711頁
- 平權的制度與個人
- 中華民國(臺灣)在法國法院之地位:以巴貝特館產案為例
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 語行行為與法規範的效力化=Illocutionary Acts and the Validation of Legal Norms |
---|---|
作 者 | 顏厥安; | 書刊名 | 政治與社會哲學評論 |
卷 期 | 32 2010.03[民99.03] |
頁 次 | 頁65-91 |
分類號 | 580.1 |
關鍵詞 | 話語行為; 語行行為; 展行; 語行力; 法效力; 法之效力化; 法律論證; 吻合方向; 建構詮釋; 社會結構; 能力; 承認; Speech act; Illocutionary act; Performative; Illocutionary force; Legal validity; Validation of legal norm; Legal argumentation; Direction of fit; Constructive interpretation; Social structure; Capacity; Recognition; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本文主張,如果法理學要探究的是有關於法的概念或法的性質之理論,那法理學就必須嘗試透過其哲學的分析來將此一任務與社會理論銜接起來。由於這是一個非常複雜的問題,因此本文僅嘗試由一個特定的理論觀點,也就是話語行為(speech act),特別是由瑟爾發展的語行行為(illocutionary act)理論的角度,提供對此一問題的初步考察。在第二部分中我將簡短說明話語行為理論,尤其是語行行為,語行力等概念的要點。第三部分裡,我將以語行行為來分析幾個主要的法理學理論立場。接著的第四部分,我將主張並論證,法效力(legal validity)概念應該被「法之效力化」(legal validation)或「規範之法效力化」(validate a norm as legal)概念所取代。此一效力化的要素就是語行行為。在第五部分當中,我將設法說明,法律論證中的建構詮釋是一種新類型的語行行為。特定的法權主體地位,往往都是透過建構詮釋之語行行為,在解放與抗爭的過程中逐漸被確立的。在這一部分當中,也初步顯示了此等理論與社會理論的關係。因此在第六部分中,將簡短研討社會理論相關問題,其要點在於指出,社會結構也是一種能力。社會結構的發展促使越來越多人擁有得以施行語行行為的能力,且被承認其擁有此等的身分地位。最後一部分則是結論。 |
英文摘要 | In this essay I want to argue that, if the aim of legal theory is to investigate the concept or nature of law, then it should utilize philosophical analysis to achieve its objective by showing how legal theory is linked to social theory. Due to the complicated nature of this mission, in this study I will explore this question from one particular theoretical viewpoint, namely speech act theory, particularly the theory of the illocutionary act developed by John Searle. In the second part the main elements of speech act theory will be explained briefly, including those concepts such as illocutionary act, illocutionary force etc. Next, I will analyze some legal theoretical positions by applying speech act theory, and then in the fourth part I will argue that we should instead attain legal validity by applying legal validation or validating a norm as legal. The chief element for this substitution is the illocutionary act. In the fifth part I will try to show that constructive interpretation is a novel kind of illocutionary act. We often see how, through the process of emancipations and struggles, certain kinds of legal status have been established by performing illocutionary acts leading to constructive interpretation. The social theoretical implications of this theory are shown thus by such outcomes. In the sixth part I then discuss this implication further. The main idea is to point out that social structure is also a kind of capability to enable more and more people to perform illocutionary acts and have their new status recognized through this process. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。