查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 新疆現代史研究述評
- 探討少數民族教育成就的理論模式
- 解構與重塑--論「筆記濁水溪」的在地社會史與自然史書寫
- 論當代政治心理學思潮中的認同問題
- 夢裡原鄉到新地的滔滔長流--從湯亭亭《The Woman Warrior》中的文化衝突淺談文化認同的重構
- 評Seylz Benhabib, «The Claims of Culture: Equality and Diversity in the Global Era»(以文化為名的主張:全球時代中的平等與多樣性)
- 文學中的族群想像與歷史文化書寫--以李潼《少年噶瑪蘭》為例
- 基督教在原住民聚落之發展與影響--以南臺灣西拉雅平埔族聚落為例
- 身分認同之轉變與歷史書寫--以南唐舊臣鄭文寶為例
- 野蠻的祖先--十六、十七世紀英格蘭的古代史書寫與祖先形象的轉折
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 新疆現代史研究述評=Research on the History of Modern Xinjiang: A Survey |
---|---|
作者姓名(中文) | 吳啟訥; |
作者姓名(外文) | Wu, Zhe; |
書刊名 | 中央研究院近代史研究所集刊 |
卷期 | 67 2010.03[民99.03] |
頁次 | 頁149-184 |
分類號 | 676.102 |
語文 | chi |
關鍵詞 | 新疆現代史; 民族史; 歷史書寫; 認同; 文化衝突; History of modern Xinjiang; Ethnic history; Historical writing; Identity; Cultural conflict; |
中文摘要 | 本文回顧並討論1950 年代以來的新疆現代史研究。處在民族主義立場兩端的中共官方與維吾爾民族主義者,都依賴歷史書寫,為各自的政治訴求尋找合理化或合法化的依據;1980 年代以來,中國大陸以漢語文進行的相關研究有令人矚目的進步,但仍未擺脫政治框架的約束。台灣研究者的相關研究,正逐漸擺脫傳統的反共情結,但又面臨能否抗拒簡單模仿西方視角及方法、保留有價值的中文思維傳統的新問題。英文學界對民國新疆史和中共治理新疆時期的研究,既發掘了認同和衝突的政治層面,也廣及文化層面的問題,成績斐然,但也一直存在東方主義傾向與對抗論述的角力。而且,在各方對新疆現代史的研究中,仍存在某種以政權更替為分期標準,切斷歷史連續性的狀況。無論如何,一甲子以來的新疆現代史研究,經歷了由青澀步向成形的過程。 |
英文摘要 | This essay reviews studies of the history of modern Xinjiang since the 1950s. Both official Chinese historians and Uygur nationalist historians have relied on historical arguments to justify their political demands. The last three decades have witnessed some progress in studies conducted in the Chinese language in Mainland China, but those studies still reflect a certain degree of political influence. Studies in Taiwan are breaking away from anti-communist biases, but, again, face certain new challenges in dealing with how to resist or follow Western historiography and methodology, and how to preserve certain valuable elements of the traditional “guoxue” or Han studies. With their concentration on the issues of identity and conflict from both political and cultural perspectives, English Chinese-studies circles have made some significant achievements in research on Republican Xinjiang and Xinjiang under PRC control; at the same time, Orientalism and counter-discourses have coexisted in these research projects. Finally, this essay shows that studies on the history of modern Xinjiang still follow the old political periodization so that 1911 and 1949 are treated as historical tuning points by most of researchers, yet this results in neglect of the historical continuity of this relatively isolated area. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。