查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 中小學學生科學學習成果的評量架構與命題示例之研發
- 九年一貫課程科學與技術認知能力指標的詮釋與評量架構之建立 : 以國中階段牛頓力學為例
- From Child Art to Visual Language of Youth: The Hungarian Visual Skills Assessment Study
- 能力本位課程發展工具之建構--模糊層級分析法與品質機能展開之應用
- 國中基測英語科題組結構與學生表現之分析
- 臺灣國中學生在TIMSS及PISA的科學學習成果表現及其啟示
- 國中基測國文科閱讀文本暨學生表現分析
- 福山植物園休園制度之探討
- 學生在臆測任務課堂表現的數學創造力評量
- 寓意的評量架構:以《西遊記》五聖解讀為中心
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 中小學學生科學學習成果的評量架構與命題示例之研發=Developing the Assessment Framework and Illustrative Test Items for Science Learning Outcomes of Elementary and High School Students in Taiwan |
---|---|
作 者 | 郭重吉; 邱美虹; 黃台珠; 張惠博; 張俊彥; 周進洋; 王國華; 陳忠志; 譚克平; 黃鴻博; | 書刊名 | 科學教育學刊 |
卷 期 | 17:6 2009.12[民98.12] |
頁 次 | 頁459-479 |
分類號 | 521.37 |
關鍵詞 | 科學學習成果; 大規模評量; 評量架構; 命題示例; Science learning outcomes; Large-scale assessment; Assessment framework; Illustrative test items; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本研究旨在參考評量教育進展的文獻和國內外實施大規模評量的經驗,針對中 小學學生科學學習成果研擬評量架構和命題示例。評量架構是針對4、6、9、12 年級 學生,先從生物、化學、地科和物理的學科內容整理重要概念和原理,其次考慮學生 科學實務表現,包括重要科學概念和原理的理解、應用、科學探究能力、量化推理能 力、科學本質的認識以及態度與情意因素。從這兩個向度的交叉形成雙向細目表,針 對選定的細目,敘寫學生在基礎、精熟、進階等三個層級的預期表現,據以發展試題。 本研究係屬先期規劃,過程中邀請中小學教師和專家學者參與研發和諮詢;研究成果 尚待考驗,但應可供規劃和發展全國性中小學學生科學學習成果調查之參考。 |
英文摘要 | With reference to existing literature and experiences gained from both domestic and international large-scale assessments in science, this study aims at developing an assessment framework and some illustrative test items, which will provide guidelines and concrete examples for item and test developments, and the administration of a national survey in subsequent studies. The assessment framework, designed for the 4th, 6th, 9th, and 12th graders, consists of, first of all, a scheme to categorize students’ major learning outcomes in content domains including biology, chemistry, physics and earth science. Within these subject areas, students’ expected performances in terms of their proficiency in science practices, including understanding and applications of science concepts and principles, scientific enquiry skills, quantitative reasoning skills, nature of science, and attitudes and other affective factors toward learning science are specified. In order to follow up students’ learning outcomes on a long term basis, numerous examples of students’ expected performances, varying from basic, proficient to advanced levels are developed. Serving as guidelines for subsequent studies along this line, some general principles of quality assessment and specifications for test development in science, as well as illustrative test items, are developed in this study. The study was coordinated by the first author, while the other coauthors respectively organized research teams consisting of science teachers, scientists, and science educators of different content areas in developing the assessment framework and illustrative test items. The work done in this study are of a preliminary nature, field tests and further refinement may be necessary. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。