查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- What Does Clinical Philosophy Practice?
- Self-Transformation and Its Philosophical Support
- 犯行青少年生涯建構系統與生涯關注
- A Study of Teachers' Concerns About an Innovation: Its Concept, Assessing Technique, and Implications
- 國小男女學童知覺父母對其教育關注與期望調查
- 初產婦於產後初期的關注內容及衛教需求之現況分析
- 比較不同生產方式之初產婦於產後初期的關注內容及衛教需求
- 論語意分割細度的文化成因和解釋限制
- 住院乳癌病人行乳房切除手術後的關注點和需求
- 桃園縣國小教師對鄉土教學活動課程實施概況之研究
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | What Does Clinical Philosophy Practice?=臨床哲學的實務 |
---|---|
作者 | 中岡成文; | 書刊名 | 哲學與文化 |
卷期 | 37:1=428 2010.01[民99.01] |
頁次 | 頁49-61 |
專輯 | 哲學諮商理論與實踐專題 |
分類號 | 178.4 |
關鍵詞 | 臨床哲學; 應用哲學; 哲學對話; 新蘇格拉底式對話; 哲學咖啡館; 關注; 公共對話; 傳播-設計研究中心; Clinical philosophy; Applied philosophy; Philosophical dialogue; Neo-Socratic dialogue; Philosophical café; Care; Public dialogue; Center for the study of communication-design; |
語文 | 英文(English) |
中文摘要 | 本文敘述日本新一波的哲學思潮,臨床哲學的幾個特徵。第一部份突顯出臨床哲學的現場性(on-the-spot-ness),各種不同的關注活動都發生在苦難者的床邊,本文呼籲哲學家投入各種關注活動的現場。在第二部分,筆者指出「第二序的關注」(例如對那些照顧他人者的關注)是臨床哲學特有的一種操作。第三部分,臨床哲學的運動被分為兩種類型的網絡構成:首先是組織(大阪大學),整合內部懷有不同意向的不同成員,其次是組織和個人形成的合作網絡,這些組織和個人在整體實務方面有哲學傾向。在第四和第五部分,筆者討論臨床哲學迄今所處理之公共對話的不同面相:各種不同形式的哲學咖啡館,其中不少原本是我們這個圈子發展出來的,另外還有「對話成分」,有了這個對話工具,就能對社會或政治議題作出宏觀層次的干預,這種干預來自臨床哲學家的發想,可以在甫創立的大阪大學傳播-設計研究中心付諸實施。接著是最後的第六部分,針對臨床哲學家在學校及收容青少年犯罪者的感化院所籌組的教育環境中所進行的哲學對話課程或工作坊,由筆者提出報告,最後筆者呼籲東亞具實踐傾向的哲學家共同合作。 |
英文摘要 | This paper describes several features of Clinical Philosophy, a new wave of philosophical thinking in Japan. In the first section, on-the-spot-ness of Clinical Philosophy is underlined, as it calls for philosophers to commit themselves ”on the spot” of various caring activities taking place at the ”bedside” of those who suffer. In the second section, I point out ”care of second order,” i.e. taking care of those who take care of others, as a characteristic operation of Clinical Philosophy. In the third section, the movement of Clinical Philosophy is classified into two types of networking: one as an organization (at Osaka University) integrating within itself diverse members with diverse intentions, and the other as a collaborative network of organizations and individuals oriented to philosophy in practice as a whole. In the forth and the fifth sections, I discuss various aspects of public dialogue Clinical Philosophy has been dealing with: philosophical café in its various forms, not few of them developed originally in our circle as well as ”Dialogue Components,” a dialogical tool enabling a macro-level intervention in social or political issues, which, conceived by Clinical Philosophers, could be implemented in the newly established Center for the Study of Communication-Design, Osaka University. Then in the sixth and final section, I report on philosophical dialogue sessions or workshops in educational settings organized by Clinical Philosophers in schools as well as at a detention center for juvenile delinquents, with a closing appeal for cooperation among philosophers with practical orientation in East Asia. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。