查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 客觀歸責理論對實務判斷因果關係的影響--兼評最高法院九十六年度臺上字第五九九二號判決
- 結果加重犯--以最高法院九十年度臺上字第四五九四號判決為主軸對近年相關判例判決之評釋
- 傷害致死罪之適用--最高法院判例與判決之評釋
- 醫療過失中的因果關係:從邱小妹人球案談起
- [實例研習]傷害結果提前發生的傷害致死罪?--再論最高法院98年度臺上字第3086號判決及其後續見解
- 曹雪芹《紅樓夢》中王熙鳳四個事件的古事今判
- 違反交通法規判斷車禍過失責任之探討
- 被害人素因、拒絕醫療與客觀歸屬--最高法院109年度臺上字第2549號刑事判決評析
- 環境損害中多數污染源之組合形式及其在侵權行為法上責任歸屬之基本原則
- 侵權行為法上之因果關係
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 客觀歸責理論對實務判斷因果關係的影響--兼評最高法院九十六年度臺上字第五九九二號判決=The Effect of Imputable Cause Theory Reasoned Causality: An Analysis on Judgment T.S.T. No. 5992 (Sup. Ct., 2007) |
---|---|
作 者 | 張麗卿; | 書刊名 | 法學新論 |
卷 期 | 13 2009.08[民98.08] |
頁 次 | 頁1-29 |
分類號 | 587.137 |
關鍵詞 | 客觀歸責; 因果關係; 風險實現; 相當因果關係; Imputable cause; Causality; Attain risk; Certain causality; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 客觀歸責理論形成於德國已有久遠的時間,且在實務上運用的也很多。一九九○年代開始,台灣刑法學界開始介紹理論,雖然未必成為主流,但在刑法學的研究上引起很大的重視。相對於此,台灣司法實務由於長期受相當因果關係的影響,該理論的運用則是近十年來的事,且是從各級法院的第一審開始。 值得關注的是,台灣最高法院九十六年度台上字第五九九二號判決突破以往相當因果關係說的束縳,大膽採用客觀規則理論,著實令人讚賞。本文除了說明客觀歸責理論的內涵外,對於司法實務運用該理論的情形,作了詳細的觀察與分析。 從本文的觀察可以發現,越來越多的實務判決接受該理論,而且接受的審判層級漸漸升高。法律學說從外國引進,能否在本土生根,是測試這個外國學說是否良好的指標。最高法院雖然已經接受客觀歸責理論,但能否可能取代相當因果關係說,成為實務的主流,還要後續的觀察。 |
英文摘要 | The Effect of Imputable Cause Theory was established to practice in Germany for decades. Since 1990, Taiwan-based criminal law scholars have been introduced Imputable Cause Theory to Taiwan. Even the theory may not be focused but it is getting of being in the spotlight for criminal-law researches. For a long time, judicial practice in Taiwan was influenced by Certain Causality. Nevertheless, the adoption of Imputable Cause Theory of criminal law accepting at district courts has been ten years. The Judgment T.S.T. No. 5992 (Sup. Ct., 2007) tremendously exceeded the limits of traditional legal opinion for Certain Causality to adopt Imputable Cause Theory is remarkable. In addition to observe and analyze the adoption of the theory in practice, this article also addressed the context of Imputable Cause Theory. It found that judicial practices in Taiwan have accepted Imputable Cause Theory, especially, higher courts. After foreign legal theory is acquainted, how to practice and fit in society is a great indicator to exam the feasible theory. The Supreme Court has accepted Imputable Cause Theory. Hence, legal researchers must be keeping concentrated on whether Imputable Cause Theory could replace Certain Causality as mainstream in practice or not. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。