查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 論WTO爭端解決機構DSB建議或裁決的履行程序=Discussion on Implementation of Recommendations and Rulings Procedure of the Dispute Settlement Body of WTO |
---|---|
作 者 | 葉錦鴻; 黃義富; | 書刊名 | 臺灣國際法季刊 |
卷 期 | 4:4 2007.12[民96.12] |
頁 次 | 頁129-171 |
分類號 | 558.2 |
關鍵詞 | 世界貿易組織; 爭端解決機構; 中止減讓或其他義務; 反制措施; ILC國家責任條文; World trade organization; WTO; The dispute settlement body; DSB; Suspension of concessions and other obligations; Countermeasures; International law commission's articles on state responsibility; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 承繼GATT而號稱「經貿聯合國」的世界貿易組織(WTO)成立後,爲解決各國間的國際經貿爭端,設置爭端解決機構(DSB)。在缺乏類似國內法中央集權執行機關的國際法中,爲確保DSB所爲之「建議或裁決」能被履行,WTO制訂DSB建議或裁決的履行程序。本文將比較與DSB建議或裁決履行程序類似的其他國際法制度,明確呈現DSB建議或裁決履行程序,在國際法上與「第二次性遵守」實際發生作用的特徵。同時,筆者將檢討一般國際法上的反制措施,比較在DSB建議或裁決履行程序中,基於《爭端解決規則與程序瞭解書(DSU)》第22條之減讓及其他義務之中止、基於DSU第4.10條的補貼暨平衡稅協定的反制措施,並認爲應將其視爲使WTO盟員間的利益平衡回復活措施。針對此點,筆者將對近年在DSU第22條6之中止減讓仲裁進行檢討,並分析減讓及其他義務之中止等的法性質。 |
英文摘要 | WTO (previously known as General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, GATT) makes decisions on international trade dispute between nations that are adjudicated by the DSB (Dispute settlement Body). Since international laws are lack of the relevant authorities in national laws, therefore, in order to ensure the implementation of recommendations or rulings of DSB, WTO set Surveillance of Implementation of Recommendations and Rulings for DSB. In additional to that, author will compare the Implementation of Recommendations and Rulings of DSB with other similar international legal systems, to clearly demonstrate the similarities with second order from international laws in practice. Furthermore, author will compare the countermeasures of general international laws with the Implementation procedure of Recommendations and Rulings of DSB under the article 22 "suspension of concession and other obligations" of "Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Dispute (DSU)" and under countermeasure refereed in article 4.10 of Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measure. This should be recognized as the measures of mutual benefit between members of WTO. From this point author will analysis the concession in arbitration under article 22(6) of DSU and further analysis on the concession in other obligations. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。