查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 不可說的在言噤聲:藍騰的反色情論證=Unspeakable Illocutionary Silencing--Langton's Free Speech Argument Against Pornography |
---|---|
作者 | 鄭光明; | 書刊名 | 歐美研究 |
卷期 | 39:1 2009.03[民98.03] |
頁次 | 頁169-224 |
分類號 | 571.944 |
關鍵詞 | 色情權利; 說話做行論; 麥肯能; 藍騰; 不可說的在言噤聲; A right to pornography; Speech-act theory; Catharine MacKinnon; Rae Langton; Unspeakable illocutionary silencing; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 色情刊物會使得婦女遭到「噤聲」的命運,因而侵害了婦女的言論自由嗎?對此,女性主義者麥肯能的回答是肯定的,而許多自由主義者的回答則是否定的,甚至認為這個主張非常荒謬。為此,藍騰特別援引英國語言哲學家奧斯丁的說話做行論,並主張:色情刊物之所以侵害了婦女的言論自由,其原因在於色情刊物使得婦女「不能拿話做事」,而這等於使得婦女的言論不能出現在言論自由市場中。本文將主張:藍騰的主張會課以說話者和聽者太多義務;為此,我們必須主張一種對聽者不要求任何「最低限度接收度」的言論自由觀,以避免上述問題。 |
英文摘要 | Famous anti-pornography feminists, Catharine MacKinnon and Rae Langton believe that pornography harms women in a very special and serious way: by silencing them or violating their civil right to freedom of speech. Langton believes that an analysis of the con-cept of speech acts shows that pornography silences women’s voices. Therefore, pornography destroys political liberty and should not be allowed. Pornography may thus make potential speech acts un-speakable for women, not by preventing them from producing or distributing sounds and scrawls, but by preventing women from do-ing things with their words. In what follows, I will argue that Lang-ton’s view would impose a burdensome range of duties on individu-als. This suggests that there are some powerful liberal reasons for thinking that the right to free speech should not include any minimal receptiveness requirement on the part of audiences. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。