查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 麥肯能的噤聲論證=MacKinnon's Silencing Argument |
---|---|
作者姓名(中文) | 鄭光明; | 書刊名 | 歐美研究 |
卷期 | 36:3 民95.09 |
頁次 | 頁427-463 |
分類號 | 544.76 |
關鍵詞 | 色情權利; 德渥肯; 麥肯能; 麥肯能的噤聲論證; 麥肯能的假設; A right to pornography; Ronald Dworkin; Catharine MacKinnon; MacKinnon's silencing argument; MacKinnon's assumption; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 我們有色情權利嗎?此為自由主義者與部分女性主義者爭論不休的問題之一。對此,麥肯能 (Catharine MacKinnon) 著名的「噤聲論證」(the silencing argument),實為值得深入探究的論證之一。依麥肯能的噤聲論證,色情刊物使婦女的言論變得沒有價值,並對婦女產生了「噤聲」(silence) 的效果,因此侵害了婦女的言論自由權利。本文將對麥肯能的噤聲論證中「噤聲」的可能意義作仔細考察。本文將主張:麥肯能的噤聲論證是不假思索的把「遭到噤聲」和「言論自由權利遭到侵害」劃上等號 (本文將稱此為「麥肯能假設」),而這其實是很有問題的假設。因此,麥肯能並未成功說服我們為何色情刊物侵害了婦女的言論自由權利。 |
英文摘要 | Catharine MacKinnon, a famous anti-pornography feminist, be-lieves that pornography harms women in a very special and serious way: by silencing them or violating their civil right to free speech. Pornography may thus prevent women from communicating their ideas to others, not by preventing them from producing or distribut-ing sounds and scrawls, but by preventing those sounds and scrawls from being understood by hearers. In this paper, I will argue that MacKinnon fails to show how pornography violates women’s civil right to freedom of speech, and suggest that thus far we remain a long way from showing why pornography harms women. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。