查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 談我國行政罰法制度下的行政不法行為與刑罰之界限--行政法學與刑事法學的對話=Administrative Illegitimacy Versus Criminal Illegitimacy |
---|---|
作 者 | 陳文貴; | 書刊名 | 法學新論 |
卷 期 | 4 2008.11[民97.11] |
頁 次 | 頁101-129 |
分類號 | 588.13 |
關鍵詞 | 行政罰; 行政犯; 秩序罰; 行政命令; 行政不法行為; Administrative penalty; Administrative criminal; Public security punishment; Administrative decree; Administrative illegitimacy; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 行政犯是刑事法學用以指稱行為人違反行政法上義務,而處以刑事罰之犯罪行為,對於行為人違反行政法上義務而受罰鍰、沒入或其他種類行政罰之處罰者,不宜以行政犯一詞稱之。 對於行為人違反行政法上義務規定,是否得以刑罰手段制裁?大法官向來僅以「衡酌事件之特性、侵害法益之輕重程度以及所欲達到之管制效果」等不確定法律概念加以帶過,而完全委由立法者決定,造成我國目前行政法規中刑罰之濫用。 本文試從刑事法學的法益保護觀點,提供一套客觀可行的界限審查標準,俾供立法者與司法者參考,期能導正我國目前行政刑法的濫用問題。 |
英文摘要 | The term "administrative illegitimacy" defined by the criminal jurisprudence is confined to criminal commitment which is punished for the contravention of the administrative law. Infringement of the administrative law which is only punished with fine, confiscation, or any other kind of administrative penalty is excluded. The constitutionality of inflicting severe penalties on a person who merely disobey the administrative obligation is not only indeterminable but also equivocal. As a result of the fact that the chancery always command the power to make decisions to legislators, penalties for administrative illegitimacy is unchecked spreading. This article is trying to provide some practical criterions not only to contribute to distinguish administrative illegitimacy from criminal illegitimacy but also to help correct the misapplication of administrative penal code. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。