頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 從現象學的觀點對質性研究的省思=A Reflection on Qualitative Research from Phenomenological Viewpoint |
---|---|
作者 | 施偉隆; Shi, Wei-long; |
期刊 | 新竹教育大學人文社會學報 |
出版日期 | 20090300 |
卷期 | 2:1 2009.03[民98.03] |
頁次 | 頁127-152 |
分類號 | 540.1 |
語文 | chi |
關鍵詞 | 現象學; 質性研究; 界域; 意義; Phenomenology; Qualitative research; Horizon; Meaning; |
中文摘要 | 現象學與質性研究的關係密切,作者以現象學作為質性研究主要的哲理基礎為起點,一方面尋求現象學中共通性的概念,另一方面藉此對質性研究進行反思,以獲得如何進行質性研究的共識。本文的主要發現如下: 意義是質性研究最基本的關切,例如量化研究的資料涉及數字,質性研究的資料則關乎意義。而界域一詞可在許多現象學者的學說中發現,它可說是區別社會科學與自然科學的關鍵性概念。本文分別從界域的定義、類型、發現方法來討論它們與意義的關係;以及從界域的融合、界域界限的變更等層面,對質性研究進行省思。 |
英文摘要 | There is a close relation between phenomenology and qualitative research. The author regards phenomenology as the main underlying philosophy of qualitative research in the beginning. On the one hand, he seeks the phenomenology common concept; on the other hand he takes this to carry on reflection of qualitative research to obtain the common view regarding how to do qualitative research. The following are the important discoveries of this article. The meaning is qualitative research’s basic concern. For example, quantitative data deal with numbers, qualitative data deal with meanings. The term “horizon”, according to the theories of many phenomenologists, is the key concept to distinguish social science and nature science. This article explores the relation between horizon and meaning from the definition, type and discovery methods of the horizon. The article further examines qualitative research from different levels such as fusion of horizon and the change of the boundaries of horizon. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。