查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 羽球現場多點無氧動力測驗與溫蓋特腳踏車測驗的相關
- 不同羽球訓練方式負荷強度之研究
- 中長距離跑步選手生理、生化值之比較
- 急性低壓低氧對上肢30秒最高與平均功率的影響
- Physiological and Notational Comparison of New and Old Scoring Systems of Singles Matches in Men's Badminton
- 跑步熱身運動結合血流限制對生理反應與運動表現的影響
- 呼吸肌訓練對男性鐵人三項選手訓練效果之影響
- 咖啡因對中高強度間歇運動後超額攝氧量的影響
- 大學男子羽球選手專項有氧動力測驗方式的評估
- 羽球現場間歇有氧動力測驗對大學男子甲組羽球單、雙打選手的運動表現與生理反應的影響
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 羽球現場多點無氧動力測驗與溫蓋特腳踏車測驗的相關=The Correlation between the Multiple Points of Badminton Field Tests and the Wingate Cycling Test for Badminton Players |
---|---|
作 者 | 陳信良; 吳昶潤; 林明儒; 曾國維; 陳忠慶; | 書刊名 | 運動生理暨體能學報 |
卷 期 | 8 2008.12[民97.12] |
頁 次 | 頁91-103 |
分類號 | 528.9012 |
關鍵詞 | 羽球運動特殊性; 無氧能量系統; 心跳率; 血乳酸; Specificity of badminton; Anaerobic system; Heart rate; Blood lactate concentration; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 目的:考驗羽球選手進行溫蓋特腳踏車與三種羽球現場無氧動力測驗的運動表現與生理參數之間是否具有正相關之假設。方法:10名大男甲組羽球選手以平衡次序法,各分別進行二次30秒溫蓋特,以及羽球現場30秒3、4和6點無氧動力測驗;每項測驗間隔至少為24小時。所有受試者均配戴心跳紀錄錶測量每項測驗時的心跳(HR),並在每項測驗後,立即進行運動自覺量表(RPE)的測驗;血乳酸(La)安排在每項測驗後第3分鐘進行分析。結果:一、運動表現:溫蓋特與羽球現場3、4和6點測驗之間完成的動力值有正相關(p<.05)。二、生理指標:溫蓋特與3、4和6點測驗之間的La、HR和RPE反應值也都具有正相關(p<.05)。結論:羽球現場3、4和6點與溫蓋特無氧動力測驗之間的運動表現與生理評估指標具有正相關。因此,這三種羽球現場測驗方式可能可以初步提供給羽球教練及運科人員,作為未來評估羽球選手的專項無氧動力之測驗方式。 |
英文摘要 | Purpose: To test the hypothesis that the performance and physiological responses observed following badminton players' performance of the Wingate anaerobic power test would correlate positively with those observed following their performance of three newly designed field tests for badminton players. Methods: Ten male university badminton players were recruited as subjects. Each subject performed one standard anaerobic power test (30-second Wingate power test) and three 30-second badminton-specific field tests (3, 4, and 6-point tests) twice, using a counter-balanced method. Rest intervals of at least 24 hours were given between the tests. All subjects wore heart rate (HR) monitors to measure HR response during each anaerobic power test, and the rating of perceived exertion (RPE) was measured immediately after each test. Blood lactate concentration (La) was analyzed at 3 minutes after each test. Results: 1) Performance: The power performance during the Wingate test had a correlation positively (p>.05) with 3, 4 and 6 points tests; 2) Physiological responses: The extent of physiological responses (La, HR, and RPE) during or after the Wingate test had significant (p<.05) positive correlation with 3, 4, and 6-point tests. The results of this study showed that the performance and physiological responses observed during and following the 3, 4, and 6-point badminton field tests correlated positively with those observed during and following the Wingate power test. Conclusions: These three badminton field tests may provide useful information for badminton coaches and sports scientists to use in the evaluation of badminton-specific anaerobic power tests in the future. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。