查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- Towards a Model for International Comparative Educational Administration: A Critical, Contextualised, and Interpretive Approach
- 馬爾科斯(Herbert Marcuse)的哲學立場暨其社會批判理論的探究
- 從教師成長看課程改革的意義
- 文化傳承與社會批判--回顧Apel, Habermas, Gadamer, Ricoeur間的詮釋學論爭
- 遠離馬克思、回到康德:論哈柏瑪斯與兩種德國批判傳統的關係
- 精微之身體:從批判理論到身體現象學
- 多元文化師資培育之社會學分析
- 美學與社會性
- 析論西方馬克思主義的主流--法蘭克福學派與批判理論
- 當代課程理論的新趨勢:從社會批判到後現代
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | Towards a Model for International Comparative Educational Administration: A Critical, Contextualised, and Interpretive Approach=從批判、脈絡化、詮釋性的角度來建立一個國際比較教育行政的模式 |
---|---|
作 者 | Samier, Eugenie A.; | 書刊名 | 人文與社會學報 |
卷 期 | 2:3 2008.12[民97.12] |
頁 次 | 頁35-64 |
分類號 | 526.1 |
關鍵詞 | 比較教育行政; 國際教育行政; 詮釋性研究; 批判理論; 脈絡化; Comparative educational administration; International educational administration; Interpretive studies; Critical theory; Contextualization; |
語 文 | 英文(English) |
中文摘要 | 為克服實徵研究法在研究國際比較教育行政時的缺點與限制,本研究試圖從批判、脈絡化、詮釋性的角度為國際比較教育行政的研究建立一個模式。此方法之理論基礎是建構在檢驗許多與比較教育行政有關的問題,其是用批判性、詮釋性、脈絡化的研究法能夠克服的。本研究為研究比較教育行政所提建之模式包含:各學科和多重學科的基礎、多個主要以質性的研究方法、以及具強烈解釋的和現象論特徵的一些詮釋性和分析實踐法。 |
英文摘要 | This paper proposes the principles for international comparative educational administration that overcomes many of the weaknesses and limitations of positivistic studies in the field through critical and interpretive approaches that are contextualized. The rationale for such an approach is constructed through an examination of many problems associated with comparative educational administration that contextualized critical and interpretive studies can overcome: the traveling problem of concepts and terminology across national and cultural boundaries, differing theoretical frameworks internationally, the different characteristics of political and economic systems, inconsistent methodologies, sources of information that have strong political or economic agendas, researcher bias, theory versus practice tensions, sameness versus difference dichotomies, and a number of university policy restrictions. The model for comparative educational administration consists of inter-and multidisciplinary foundations, multiple methods that are predominantly qualitative, and a number of interpretive and analytical practices that are strongly hermeneutic and phenomenological in character. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。