查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- Five Formulations of the Conceptual Structure of Motion and Their Cross-Linguistic Applicability: With Special Reference to Chinese
- HMM式中文詞性自動標注系統
- 中文構詞與句法的概念結構
- 多重專家應用於線上手寫中文文字識別
- 線上手寫中文文字辨認系統的筆段抽取
- The Survey of On-Line Chinese Character Recognition
- On Speeding Radical-Based On-Line Chinese Character Recognition Through the Directional Matching of the First and Last Segments
- 言為心聲:《哈姆雷》劇中柯勞狄的語言及其兩段獨白的中譯
- 提升電機機械實習實作能力的電腦輔助教學
- A Chinese User Interface Database Design Tool Based on the Entity-Relationship Model
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | Five Formulations of the Conceptual Structure of Motion and Their Cross-Linguistic Applicability: With Special Reference to Chinese=位移事件概念結構的五種分析模式及其對中文的適用性 |
---|---|
作者 | 儲誠志; | 書刊名 | Concentric: Studies in Linguistics |
卷期 | 34:1 2008.01[民97.01] |
頁次 | 頁1-26 |
分類號 | 802.6 |
關鍵詞 | 位移事件; 概念結構; 語言表達; 中文; Motion; Conceptual structure; Linguistic representation; Chinese; |
語文 | 英文(English) |
中文摘要 | 對於位移事件的概念結構,在認知語言學領域裏提出的分析模式 主要有五種。這五種模式分別是Fillmore 等的「原點-路徑-目標」模 式,Talmy 的「移動物-位移-路徑-參照物」模式,Langacker 著眼於 位移事件的時間屬性來描寫移動物空間位置的序列改變的時間序列模 式,Jackendoff 把位移事件的結構看作是由觀念領域裏一個更為抽象 的「函項- 參數」結構通過映射而生成的衍生分析模式,以及 Wierzbicka 及其追隨者用一套有限的「語義元素」來描寫位移事件的 自然的語義元語言模式。本文對這五種模式分別進行討論,考察比較 這五種模式對位移事件相關語言表達的描寫分析是否充分、一致、和 簡明,並主要通過中文來檢驗不同模式在跨語言分析中的適用性。文 章顯示,Talmy 的「移動物-位移-路徑-參照物」模式優於「原點-路 徑-目標」等其他四種模式。 |
英文摘要 | This paper reviews five primary proposals for motion characterization made within the paradigm of cognitive linguistics and examines their applicability for analyzing motion representation in Mandarin Chinese. The five proposals are Fillmorean Source-Path-Goal formulation, Talmy’s Figure-Move-Path-Ground characterization, Langacker’s temporal perspective on the mover’s sequential change of location, Jackendoff’s view of motion as a mapping of a general function-argument conceptual organization, and Wierzbicka et al.’s semantic-prime style explication. With special reference to Chinese, it is observed that these five proposals differ with regard to level of descriptive adequacy, consistency and straightforwardness in analysis, and cross-linguistic applicability. In contrast, Talmy’s framework provides a more fully-specified treatment of motion. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。