查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- Does Injustice Perception Decline Job Performance? A Study on Organizational Justice and Teachers' Job Performance in Elementary School and Junior High School
- 高職餐飲管理科及非餐飲管理科畢業生在餐飲工作表現之比較研究
- 臺灣地區文化中心員工組織公民行為模型之研究
- 行動或狀態導向、目標層次、工作複雜度對國中生行動控制策略與工作表現之影響
- 組織結構特性對組織公正與組織公民行為關係影響之研究
- 中央警察大學畢業生分發基層警員可行性之分析
- 目標來源、目標難度與性別對大專學生游泳之工作表現及內在動機的影響
- 組織公正、信任、組織公民行為之研究 : 社會交換理論之觀點
- 人際親疏及工作次數對團體中個人工作表現的影響
- 製造業從業人員之社會交換變數在組織公正與工作滿意對組織公民行為關係中的中介角色分析--以多重評量來源之研究設計觀點
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | Does Injustice Perception Decline Job Performance? A Study on Organizational Justice and Teachers' Job Performance in Elementary School and Junior High School=知覺組織不公正會降低工作表現?國中小教師組織公正與工作表現之研究 |
---|---|
作 者 | 鄭燿男; | 書刊名 | 彰化師大教育學報 |
卷 期 | 13 2008.06[民97.06] |
頁 次 | 頁1-24 |
分類號 | 522.2 |
關鍵詞 | 組織公正; 工作表現; Organizational justice; Job performance; |
語 文 | 英文(English) |
中文摘要 | 台灣的學校裡有一隱而不顯的組織不公正情況:工作投入越多負擔反越重,報酬卻無法增加;投入越少工作越少,報酬卻一點也未少,本研究稱此為投入-報酬不公正。根據公正理論此將影響工作表現,但學校情境中尚未有實徵資料加以檢證。本文抽樣台灣各縣市1449位教師作分析,並輔以訪談結果;檢驗公正理論在台灣學校之適用性及組識公正與教師工作表現之關係。 研究結果顯示台灣教師認爲分配公正、程序公正、互動公正知覺普遍還算公正;但投入-報酬有不公正的情形。分配公正、程序公正對於工作表現具有正影響;但互動不公正、投入報酬不公正之下,教師工作表現仍高;此結果顯示公正理論僅能適用於解釋分配公正、程序公正與工作表現的關係;對於互動不公正、投入-報酬不公正與工作表現的關係則無法解釋適用。本研究透過訪談資料發現:學校教師因爲工作認同與工作自尊的關係,努力作育英才;雖然互動不公正、投入-報酬不公正,教師仍然努力以赴其工作。不過,此訪談結果只是初步探討,後續有待大量實徵資料檢驗。 |
英文摘要 | In Taiwan, there exists a common phenomenon in schools, the more one involves, and the more the work load, but the reword can not be added. On the contrary, the less work load, but the reword is the same. This study calls it, the involvement-reword justice. This perception influences job performance according to the proposition of justice theory but few studies explore the situation in Taiwan. 1449 teachers from some counties and cities in Taiwan are sampled in the study and then filled out a questionnaire from which afterward, some teachers are interviewed to add to the results. Testing justice theory is applied and interpreted with the relation between teachers' organizational justice and job performance. The result reveals teachers feel the distributional justice, procedural justice, interactional justice are considered fair, but the involvement-reword justice some unfair. The distributional justice and procedural justice are positive influence to job performance, but when the interactional and involvement-reword justice are unfair, the teachers' performance is still positive. Therefore, the justice theory can be applied to interpret the results of the distributional justice and procedural justice but the interactional and involvement-reword justice can't. This interview reveals the primarily differential results above which are in job identification and job esteem, because teachers like teaching, though the interactional and involvement-reword justices are unfair but they still work hard. Noticed, the interview is the basic analysis they needs further exploration. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。