頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | Jean Ladrière on Science and Theology and Their Mediation by Philosophy=賴醉葉論經由哲學調和科學與神學 |
---|---|
作 者 | 苑舉正; | 書刊名 | 哲學與文化 |
卷 期 | 35:12=415 2008.12[民97.12] |
頁 次 | 頁89-114 |
專 輯 | 道德、理性與信仰:賴醉葉教授逝世週年紀念專題 |
分類號 | 149.2 |
關鍵詞 | 賴醉葉; 科學; 信仰; 神學; 哲學; 存在; 實在; J. Ladrière; Science; Faith; Theology; Philosophy; Existence; Reality; |
語 文 | 英文(English) |
中文摘要 | 長期以來,科學與宗教的關係一直是哲學討論中最重要的題目之一。它的重要性主要來自於如下事實:科學與宗教都意圖針對人類存在的問題提出完整圖象。就我們處處生存於有限條件的人類而言,追求超越生存環境,並因此而獲得融入無限存在的可能,確實是一種很可以理解的渴望。面對這份渴望,哲學家從各種理論進行各式立場的論述,也提出差異極大的觀點。在這些觀點中,賴醉葉所提出的,有兩點值得特別注意:第一、他的觀點包含各種具代表意義的重要觀點;第二、透過哲學分析論證,他的觀點可以融合科學與神學。本文亦因為此兩點而區分為兩部分:第一部份透過揭示賴醉葉觀點,指出有關科學與宗教的哲學論述中所出現的幾種立場(即「反實證論」、「存有學的區別」以及「情感式的許諾」),均已經涵蓋於此觀點中。第二部分則是重整此觀點,並解釋融合個人與外在世界的關係,如何成為一個可以「察覺」的關係。這些說明與論證同時也化解了科學與神學之間的表面差異。在化解的論證過程裡,賴醉葉清晰呈現,神學同樣透過依附「封閉的理智」與符應「特殊的實在」這兩種方式,使得其所使用的語言,成為有意義的語句。「依附」與「符應」這兩個概念也為科學與神學之間的「相互滋潤」,提出一條調和的康莊大道。 |
英文摘要 | The relationship of science and religion has for long been an issue of prime importance in philosophy. The importance comes mainly from the fact that both science and religion depict its own comprehensive picture of human existence. We, while tending to go beyond the limits beset by the finitude of human conditions, long for these pictures in order to be incorporated into the infinitude. Though philosophers undergo divergently theoretical schemes, they ceaselessly investigate the different pictures by resorting to various perspectives. Among these perspectives, Jean Ladrière's deserves to special attention because of two reasons: 1. It includes many other perspectives. 2. It is engaged with significant mediation of science and theology by philosophy. This paper is accordingly divided into two parts: 1. An exposition of Ladrière's perspective which includes all major philosophical positions regarding science and religion (i.e., 'anti-positivism', 'the ontological differentiation' and 'the emotive commitment'). 2. A reconstruction of Ladrière's structure in which the existential significance of relating oneself with the outside world becomes 'perceptual' by transcendental arguments which dissolve the apparent discrepancy between science and theology. In this dissolution, Ladrière intends to make explicit that theology also resorts to a sensible language which validates its statements by relying on a closed intelligibility and corresponding to a particular reality. The combination of the 'reliance' and the 'correspondence' together paves the way for the mutual enrichment between science and theology. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。