查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 廢除分區定額錄取與取消列考三民主義的歷史省思--從轉型正義角度加以觀察=Historical Reflections on Abolition of Quotas by District and Cancellation of "Three Principles of the People" as Test Subject--Seen from the Perspective of Transitional Justice |
---|---|
作 者 | 李震洲; | 書刊名 | 國家菁英 |
卷 期 | 4:2 2008.06[民97.06] |
頁 次 | 頁53-70 |
專 輯 | 轉型正義與國家考試 |
分類號 | 573.44 |
關鍵詞 | 轉型正義; 分區定額擇優錄取; 降低錄取標準; 國父遺教; Transitional justice; Qualification quotas in order of achievement by district; Lowered qualification standards; Dr. Sun Yat-sen's "three principles of the people"; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 2000年總統大選以後第一次中央政府政黨輪替,對國內的政治環境與行政生態,產生了前所未見之衝擊;號稱本土草根政黨的民主進步黨,在八年執政期間,耗費許多政府資源和民間活力,去推動一些社會尚未形成多數共識引發各界爭議之改革作法,以轉型正義為名,對政治文化的去中國化、對歷史記憶的去蔣化等都是顯著實例。所幸考試院長是傳統政治上的邊陲地帶,2000年雖然政權更替,但第9屆考試院院長及考試委員均受6年任期保障,2002年第10屆考試院組成,考試委員結構整體看仍然呈現藍大於綠的板塊;所以採合議制之考試院,重要考銓政策仍能維持在穩定中發展;可以說在考銓政策體系範圍內,可以轉型正義的空間不多。本文嘗試從轉型正義角度,探討威權體制時期考銓機關廢除具有大中國意識之分區定額擇優錄取制度,以及不再列考特定政黨意識型態之國父遺教三民主義科目之背景經過,並導出國家考試制度改革其實只有公平正義與否問題,無關涉轉型正義問題。 |
英文摘要 | The 2000 presidential election resulted for the first time Republic of China on Taiwan history in the handover of power in the central government from one political party to another. This development had an unprecedented impact on the political environment and administrative atmosphere. Over its eight years at the head of the executive, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), known as the country's grassroots party, expended tremendous government resources and popular energy in its push for various controversial reforms that had not yet achieved the backing of public consensus. Efforts to “de-Sinofy” (reduce Chinese content and influence) political culture and erase the legacy of Chiang Kai-shek and his family from the historical memory, made in the name of “transitional justice,” are two notable examples as part of this campaign. Fortunately, the Examination Yuan lies at the margins of the traditional political realm. While power was handed over to a new party in 2000, the ninth Minister of Examination and Examination Yuan members were appointed for six-year guaranteed terms. The tenth Examination Yuan membership was appointed in 2002, and retained a predominantly “blue” (Kuomintang) composition as compared to its “green” (DDP) constituents. Consequently, major policies regarding examination and recruitment administered by the Examination Yuan, a consultative body, have proceeded in relative stability. Accordingly, there has been little leeway for transitional justice within the parameters of examination and recruitment policy. From the perspective of transitional justice, this paper endeavors to explore the underlying background of the abolition of the district quota system indicative of strong “greater Chinese” ideology by civil service recruitment agencies during the authoritarian period in Taiwan, and the elimination of the “Three Principles of the People” by Dr. Sun Yat-sen as a test subject. These steps led to questions as to whether reforms of the national examination system were fair and equitable, but did not touch upon questions of transitional justice. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。