查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 從美國法之觀點論智慧財產權於競爭法之定位--兼論我國公平交易法第45條之適用=Antitrust's Take on Intellectual Property on the Basis of American Laws and the Interpretation of Article 45 of the R.O.C. Fair Trade Act |
---|---|
作者 | 張哲倫; Chang, Roger; |
期刊 | 法學叢刊 |
出版日期 | 20080700 |
卷期 | 53:3=211 2008.07[民97.07] |
頁次 | 頁91-128 |
分類號 | 585.8 |
語文 | chi |
關鍵詞 | 智慧財產權; 競爭法; 公平交易法; 邊際成本; 網路效應; 公共財物; 先行者優勢; 飛利浦; CD-R專利集中授權; 最高行政法院96年判字第553號判決; 獨占; 合法獨占; Intellectual property; Antitrust; The fair trade act; Marginal cost; Network effect; Public good; First-mover advantage; Philips; CD-R patent pooling; Monopoly; Legal monopoly; |
中文摘要 | 競爭法的焦點在於鼓勵競爭及保障競爭秩序,保護智慧財產權的法律則基於鼓勵創新研發的目的,授予權利人在一定期間内及特定的範圍内,享有排除他人參與競爭的權利,兩個不同領域的法律在適用的範圍上,可能有所重疊或衝突,此時在個案的判斷上,得否將智慧財產權視為與其他一般財產權無異,而直接適用競爭法來規範智慧財產權;或是將智慧財產權作特別的考量處理,使其成為競爭法適用上的例外,論理上向來有所爭議。這樣的爭議於美國司法實務的見解迄今未能統一,美國法對於這些問題的探究已有相當一段時間,學說及實務軍累積了質量可觀的意見,針對競爭法上應如何看待智慧財產權人行使權利的行為,以及專利權在競爭法上之地位是否與其他權利毫無區別,本文參考美國法上的判決前例,主張競爭法應彈性地處理行使智慧財產權的行為等問題,尤其應兼顧智慧財產權異於一般財產權之特質,在競爭法上特別予以考量。 |
英文摘要 | The antitrust law is aimed at encouraging competition and protecting market order, while the intellectual property law is designed to promote innovation by granting exclusive right with limited time and scope. The two different laws may overlap and conflict in application. It has become a controversial issue whether the intellectual property should be deemed as a special subject or even an exception in the field of antitrust, or the intellectual property is just another form of property right. This issue is unsettled in the States, and a significant number of theories and court cases about how to deal with intellectual property in the antitrust law have been developed. On the basis of the U.S. references, this article proposes that because of the special nature, a flexible approach should be taken when anti-competition issues involving intellectual property are considered. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。