查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 歸納法與自然類:裴爾士、蒯因、與哈克=Induction and Natural Kinds: Peirce, Quine, and Haack |
---|---|
作 者 | 鄭喜恆; | 書刊名 | 哲學與文化 |
卷 期 | 35:8=411 2008.08[民97.08] |
頁 次 | 頁67-90 |
專 輯 | 蒯因百年在臺灣專題 |
分類號 | 145.59 |
關鍵詞 | 蒯因; 裴爾士; 哈克; 歸納法; 自然類; W. V. Quine; Charles Peirce; Susan Haack; Induction; Natural kinds; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 「蒯因是否是實用主義哲學家?」是相當受到討論的議題。本文檢視蒯因對於歸納法問題、以及歸納法與自然類之間關係的主張,並且比較蒯因、裴爾士以及哈克對於相關議題的主張。目的是從以裴爾士與哈克為代表人物的實用主義與自然主義傳統來檢視蒯因的主張。本文所做的比較顯示出,雖然蒯因的想法與裴爾士與哈克的想法有相當多類似之處,但是也有重要的不相容之處,這顯示我們無法將蒯因毫無扭曲地嵌進從裴爾士到哈克的自然主義傳統之中。 |
英文摘要 | The question of whether W. V. Quine is a pragmatist is one that has attracted much discussion. This paper examines Quine's reconstruction of and solution to the traditional problem of induction and his view of the role of the notion of natural kinds in his solution, and then compares his views with those of Charles Peirce and Susan Haack about the problem of induction and related issues. The main purpose is to connect Quine to the philosophical tradition of pragmatism and naturalism, of which Peirce and Haack are representatives. However, this comparison shows that despite many similarities, some important disagreements between Quine, on the one hand, and Peirce and Haack, on the other hand, prevent Quine's views from being smoothly integrated into the realist framework that Peirce builds for understanding and answering the problem of induction and related issues. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。