查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 中學生的解釋風格、生活壓力和憂鬱之關係:從憂鬱的認知特異質-壓力模式探討
- 中學生解釋風格量表之編製及其效度研究
- Prevalence and Correlates of Depressive Symptoms in the Elderly of Rural Communities in Southern Taiwan
- 臺南市國中學生焦慮、自尊心、內外控信念和生活壓力之相關研究
- Life Stress, Age, Cortisol Nonsuppression and Subtypes of Depression
- 生活壓力、歸因組型、社會支援與大學生之憂鬱症
- 機構安置少年之生活壓力對憂鬱情緒之影響:以自尊為調節變項
- 大學生的生活壓力
- 照顧一位憂鬱症併有自殺企圖患者之護理經驗
- 國中生之生活壓力、憂鬱經驗與復原力之相關研究
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 中學生的解釋風格、生活壓力和憂鬱之關係:從憂鬱的認知特異質-壓力模式探討=Exploring the Relations between Explanatory Style, Life Stress, and Depression in High School Students: From Cognitive Diathesis-Stress Model Perspective |
---|---|
作者 | 高民凱; 林清文; Kao, Ming-kai; Lin, Chin-wen; |
期刊 | 輔導與諮商學報 |
出版日期 | 20080500 |
卷期 | 30:1 2008.05[民97.05] |
頁次 | 頁41-59 |
分類號 | 527.74 |
語文 | chi |
關鍵詞 | 中學生; 生活壓力; 解釋風格; 認知特異質-壓力模式; 憂鬱; Cognitive diathesis-stress model; Depression; Explanatory style; High school student; Life stress; |
中文摘要 | 本研究以憂鬱的無望感理論(Abramson, Metalsky & Alloy, 1989)為基礎,考驗解釋風格的認知特異質─壓力模式應用在中學生這個發展階段的適用性,以及自尊在此模式中扮演的角色。共計抽樣1,326人,經篩檢後得1,064份有效資料。 結果摘要如下: 一、生活壓力對中學生的憂鬱症狀具有顯著的預測力,能解釋22.7%的變異量。 二、在控制了生活壓力的影響之後,負向事件通則性解釋風格對中學生的憂鬱症狀之預測,仍具顯著性,處在同樣生活壓力之下的中學生,當面對負向事件時的解釋越傾向通則性,將有較高的機會產生憂鬱的症狀。 三、中學生的負向事件通則性解釋風格和生活壓力兩者在對憂鬱症狀進行預測時,並無顯著的交互作用存在。 四、中學生的自尊和負向事件通則性解釋風格兩者對憂鬱症狀的預測力,在控制了生活壓力的影響之後,仍具顯著性。但沒有支持中學生的自尊、負向事件通則性解釋風格以及生活壓力三者之間,在對憂鬱症狀進行預測時,有顯著的交互作用存在。 五、中學生解釋風格的認知特異質─壓力模式之特定性假設只得到部分支持。 |
英文摘要 | The purpose of this study is to explore the relations between explanatory style, life stress, and depression in high school students. Based on the hopelessness theory of depression (Abramson, Metalsky, & Alloy, 1989), we test the applicability of the cognitive diathesis-stress model to high school students. Questionnaires were administered to 1,326 high school students, of which 1,064 were valid. All data was analyzed by SPSS, and the main findings of this study were as follows: 1. Life stress was a strong predictor of depressive symptoms, and it could explain the 22.7% variance of depression. 2. Having gained control of the influence of life stress, explanatory style was also a strong predictor of depressive symptoms saliently. 3. Explanatory style did not moderate the relationship between life stress and depressive symptoms. 4. With control over the influence of life stress, explanatory style and self-esteem could provide the extra explanation of 22.6% variance of depression. However, a 3-way interaction between life stress, explanatory style, and self-esteem did not gain supported. 5. The specificity hypothesis of cognitive diathesis-stress model was partially supported by the evidence. Discussion and suggestions concerning the future study and the guidance practice for high school students were provided. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。