查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 中學生解釋風格量表之編製及其效度研究
- 中學生的解釋風格、生活壓力和憂鬱之關係:從憂鬱的認知特異質-壓力模式探討
- The Impacts of Arthritis on Psychological Aspects of the Elderly
- 大學生的憂鬱情緒與歸因--憂鬱性歸因理論的驗證
- 藥師於憂鬱症治療中扮演的角色
- 老年憂鬱症暨病例介紹
- 形式與技法--臺灣高中學生水彩作品淺介
- 城鄉地區國中學生資源回收信念、行為意圖差異研究
- Reliability of HDRS and HARS Telepsychiatric Assessment of Anxiety and Depression
- 成年人慢性病壓力與憂鬱相關之探討
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 中學生解釋風格量表之編製及其效度研究=The Construct of the Explanatory Style Inventory |
---|---|
作 者 | 高民凱; 林清文; | 書刊名 | 彰化師大輔導學報 |
卷 期 | 23 2002.06[民91.06] |
頁 次 | 頁131-162 |
分類號 | 521.18 |
關鍵詞 | 中學生; 量表編製; 解釋風格; 憂鬱; Depression; Explanatory style; High school student; Inventory development; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本研究參酌「習得無助的修訂模式」(Abramson, Seligman, & Teasdale, 1978)之架構,並實地訪談中學生,收集中學生在生活中常發生的事件及其可能的解釋,以為編擬題目時的依據,透過量表編製程序編製「中學生解釋風格量表」,並以多種途徑建立量表的信度、效度資料。所得資料經皮爾遜積差相關法、因素分析等統計方法處理。 研究結果摘要如下: 1.中學生解釋風格量表具有良好的穩定性,量尺的隔雙週重測信度介於.52~.67;然其內部一致性仍未臻理想,量尺的Cronbach α係數介於.16~.62。 2.中學生解釋風格量表和不同型式量表的同時關連效度,「正向事件個人性解釋風格量尺」、「負向事件個人性解釋風格量尺」、「正向事件通則性解釋風格量尺」、「負向事件通則性解釋風格量尺」等四個基本量尺介於0~.36'「正向事件解釋風格量尺」、「負向事件解釋風格量尺」、「解釋風格量尺」等三個組合量尺介於.08~.31。在因素考驗中,「正向事件解釋風格量尺」及「負向事件解釋風格量尺」各可得二因素,分別可解釋16.11 %、14.96%的量尺變異量,符合量尺所依據的理論結構。 3.中學生解釋風格量表和以CAVE技術進行的評量之間的相關係數介於-.12~.06。另外,四個基本量尺之間的相關介於-.07~.13。 4.中學生的解釋風格和同時及未來的憂鬱傾向之間有顯著相關,符合量尺所依據的理論結構。 |
英文摘要 | The purpose of this study was to construct an instrument, the Explanatory Style Inventory-ESI. ESI was expected to use in evaluating high school student's explanatory style. The literature was reviewed to initial the schema of evaluation, and the standardized procedure of instrument developing was used to construct ESI. 3,852 subjects completed the ESI. All quantitative data was analysis by SPSS, the statistical analysis result supported the validity and reliability of ESI. The main findings of this study were as follows: 1.the ESI has good test-retest reliability and preservative internal consistency. 2.The concurrent validity between different types of the ESI was modest and its construct validity was good. 3.The concurrent validity between the CAVE ratings and the scores from the ESI was not good. The correlations between the four scales of the ESI range from -.07 to .13. 4.The correlations between high school student's explanatory style and their concurrent and future depression tendency were salient. Many suggestions was prompted according to the results and it's discussions. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。