頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 異質產品研發與策略性貿易政策=Research and Development of Heterogeneous Products and Strategic Trade Policy |
---|---|
作 者 | 王文傑; | 書刊名 | 國立虎尾科技大學學報 |
卷 期 | 26:4 2007.12[民96.12] |
頁 次 | 頁57-68 |
分類號 | 555.4 |
關鍵詞 | 異質產品; 產品研發; 技術移轉; 策略性貿易政策; Heterogeneous products; Product R&D; Technological transfer; Strategic trade policy; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 每個國家對於策略性產業都會訂定產業政策,以輔導本國廠商。許多文獻是在探討寡佔產業且產品為同質性的情形下,研究廠商之間製程研發(Process R&D) 行為的互動,或加上政府政策的影響。但是,拫據Scherer & Ross (1990) 所論述的,美國產業中有四分之三的R&D 投資是用在產品研發(Product R&D) 上;因此,對於寡佔廠商之間且產品存在差異化的情形下,產品R&D 的競爭與政府政策的效果,將是可以深入探討的課題。 本文研究的目的,在於政府對廠商進行(1)產品R&D 補貼、(2) 出口補貼及(3) 技術移轉等產業政策對於廠商R&D 決策、產出及一國褔利水準的影響,並將研究結果與Spencer & Brander (1983) 的文章所得到的結論對照比較。 |
英文摘要 | Every country will enact the industrial policy to the strategic industry, in order to coach the national manufacturer. A lot of literature study products under the homogeneity nature situation in duopoly industry, study manufacturers make research and develop (Process R&D), and the behavioral of interaction, or add the influence of the government policy. However, according to Scherer & Ross (1990) describe, American have 3/4 R&D of investment to be spend on products R&D; So as to duopoly to take manufacturer and products have situation of heterogeneity. Hence, the competition of the products R&D and result of government policy, will be the interesting topic and worth studying. The purpose that this paper studies, lie in the government goes on to the manufacturer (1) The products R&D subsidies, (2) Export subsidies and (3) Technological transfer, etc. industrial policy make the manufacturer R&D, products and one country welfare, and the result of study made by Spencer & Brander (1983) articles classical conclusion contrast comparison. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。