查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- The Outcomes and Implementation of the Ability Grouping Program of Freshman English at the National Kaohsiung Marine University
- 大一英語能力安置測驗之實施成效探討--以某科技大學為例
- 中原大學英文能力分班政策實證研究
- English Placement Practice and Instruction: A Needs Analysis from the Perspective of Technological University Students
- Achievement Grouping and Students' Progress in Freshman English Classes at Feng Chia University
- 國中不宜實施能力分班
- 能力分班與常態編班:美國經驗的啟示
- Casting a Net on the Memorable Freshman Year: Infusing Webpage Construction into the Freshman English Syllabus
- 國中學生的時間概念
- 評估整合式語言教學運用於大二英文課程之可行性--以長榮管理學院為例
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | The Outcomes and Implementation of the Ability Grouping Program of Freshman English at the National Kaohsiung Marine University=國立高雄海洋科大四技大一英文分級教學實施成效及檢討 |
---|---|
作 者 | 蔡金治; | 書刊名 | 國立高雄海洋科大學報 |
卷 期 | 22 2008.02[民97.02] |
頁 次 | 頁169-184 |
分類號 | 524.38051 |
關鍵詞 | 能力分班; 大一英文; 安置測驗; Ability grouping program; Freshman English; Placement test; |
語 文 | 英文(English) |
中文摘要 | 本研究旨在探討國立高雄海洋科技大學四技大一英文之分級教學情況及其實施之 成效。本校自民國九十二年九月起開始實施大一英文分級教學,其成效如下:(1)因材施 教;(2)提升教師之教學品質及效率;(3)提高學生之學習意願及動機;(4)增進師生之互 動。然而,面臨的困難如下:(1)分級難以精準;(2)教材不適用於某級數;(3)每位老師 之教學內容及進度不一;(4)兼任老師之配合度不一;(5)評分標準不一;(6)C 級之補救 教學成效不彰;(7)相關行政配套措施之問題;(8)人力資源不足。 最後,筆者對高雄海洋科大之英文分級教學建議如下:(1)以聯招及校內加考之安置 測驗成績平均,依成績高低順序分班;(2)建立更準確之安置測驗之題庫(應包括聽力測 驗);(3)分為四級;(4)選擇更適切之教材(包括聽說讀寫);(5)加強補救教學;(6)訂定 合理及公平之評分標準;(7)加強專、兼任老師之互動與配合;(8)安置測驗及分級教學 事宜應由專屬單位統籌策劃執行。如果能改進以上諸點,相信國立高雄海洋科技大學之 大一英文的分級教學必能盡善盡美。 |
英文摘要 | The ability grouping program of Freshman English at National Kaohsiung Marine University (NKMU) has been implemented since Sept., 2003. Therefore, the study attempts to examine its implementation and outcomes of three semesters at NKMU. On the one hand, the advantages are as follows: (1) it makes the students study English at a suitable level; (2) it makes the English instruction more effective; (3) it motivates the students’ learning English; (4) it enhances the learning interaction between the teachers and students. On the other hand, we have encountered the following difficulties: (1) it is difficult to place the students into their own levels exactly; (2) the textbooks are graded inappropriately; (3) there is no standardized syllabus among the different teachers at different levels; (4) there is no regular communication among the teachers; (5) the assessment of the students is unfair and inconsistent; (6) the remedial teaching for the students of level C is ineffective; (7) the problems of the administrative procedures; (8) the human resource is quite insufficient and limited. In conclusion, I would like to give some suggestions for the ability grouping program of Freshman English at NKMU. My suggestions are as follows: (1) to place the students by the average of both English scores of the entrance exam and the placement test; (2) to establish the well-graded and well-organized questions for the placement test; (3) to place the students into four levels; (4) to rearrange the most suitable textbooks (including listening,speaking, reading, and writing); (5) to reinforce the remedial teaching; (6) to regulate a fair and systematic assessment of the grades; (7) to build up a frequent and regular communication among the English teachers and (8) to assign a specific organization or center to be responsible for the placement test and the ability grouping program of Freshman English at NKMU. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。