頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 從阿奎那到普蘭丁格:信念知識合理性問題的歷史解答=From Aquinas to Plandinga: A Historical Response to the Question of Belief's Rationality |
---|---|
作者姓名(中文) | 翟志宏; | 書刊名 | 哲學與文化 |
卷期 | 35:4=407 2008.04[民97.04] |
頁次 | 頁25-41 |
專輯 | 多瑪斯哲學中的理性、信仰與倫理專題 |
分類號 | 142.272 |
關鍵詞 | 信念; 合理性; 教父; 阿奎那; 證據主義; 普蘭丁格; Belief; Rationality; Father; Aquinas; Evidentialism; Plantinga; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 在西方,為闡明宗教信念的認知合理性及其知識地位,不同時期的基督宗教神學家和哲學家做出了不懈的努力。在古典時期,首先是被稱之為「教父」的一批神學家們在信仰體系內對希臘哲學的吸收、改造與容納;然後是多瑪斯•阿奎那在希臘哲學和基督宗教之間所作的全面整合,試圖在可能的範圍內以哲學的方式思考與表述信仰問題。然而這種為闡釋信念知識合理性的努力,受到了以休謨和康德為代表的近代證據主義的挑戰。普蘭丁格在重新界定「合理性」標準的基礎上,對宗教信念的知識地位問題做出了更為寬泛的解答。這種解答的歷史性為我們在較為合理的基礎上評價哲學與宗教之間的關係,提供了多層次的認知空間和思考維度。 |
英文摘要 | In the west, Christian theologians and philosophers in different periods make efforts to clarify the cognitive rationality of religious faith and its knowledge position. At the classic period, it's the theologians who called ”Father” that do this first; they absorb, change and contain Greek philosophy into Christianity. Then, Thomas Aquinas makes a whole integration between Greek philosophy and Christianity, and reflects the faith problem and express it in the philosophic way. But Hume and Kant, representing modern evidentialism, challenge the explanations of religious rationality. Alvin Plantinga, after redefining the standard of ”rationality”, answers the knowledge position of Christian belief in a broad sense. This explanative history supplies us multiple cognitive and thinking dimensions to estimate the relationship between religion and philosophy on a more rational basis. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。