頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 從實踐理智到合理性--麥金泰爾的行動哲學初探=From Practical Reason to Rationality--A Preliminary Inquiry to MacIntyre's Action Philosophy |
---|---|
作 者 | 尤淑如; 林朝成; | 書刊名 | 哲學與文化 |
卷 期 | 35:1=404 2008.01[民97.01] |
頁 次 | 頁99-112 |
專 輯 | 哲學的行動理論專題 |
分類號 | 144.8 |
關鍵詞 | 麥金泰爾; 行動哲學; 實踐理智; 實踐智慧; 實踐推理; 實踐合理性; 倫理教育; A. MacIntyre; Action philosophy; Practical reason; Practical wisdom; Practical reasoning; Practical rationality; Ethics education; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 行動哲學一個很重要的課題即是在探討「行動者」為什麼要行動?麥金泰爾(A. MacIntyre)行動哲學所認同的是傳統的立場,認為行動者之所以要行動,他首先關注的前提是「什麼是行動者目前所應該要追求的善」,其次是「當時實際面對的情境為何」,當行動者面對這兩項前提,這些前提會給行動者帶來某些種類的「提示」,使行動者知道如何抑制自身的激情而做出應該做的行動。他批評當代兩種主流行動論述中的行動者並不真正清楚知道自己該做什麼才是正確的、合理的;行動者不關心做出正確的行為對自己而言有什麼價值和意義;行動者不會因為守法而感到高興;甚至,也不會因為成為好公民而感到驕傲。在他看來行動之實踐合理性除了可以是合法的,更重要的,它更應該是合乎倫理的、合乎善的原則。因為,一個有倫理、追求善的行動者,必然是一個本著實踐理智進行道德推理,而後行動的人。然而麥金泰爾是怎麼論述他的主張呢?他的論點何以是合理的、客觀的?此為本論文所欲探討的主題。 |
英文摘要 | One of the important topics of action philosophy is to explore why an actor has to act. In this regard, A. MacIntyre's action philosophy identifies with the traditional position that the necessity for an actor to act is premised first on the ”good that an actor is supposed to be pursue nowadays” and secondly on the ”current situation one is confronted with.” These two premises will become some kind of reminders for the actors to restrain their own passions so as to do the right things. MacIntyre's criticizes that the actors belonging to the two mainstream discourses about action don't really know what are the right and reasonable things to do. These actors do not care about how valuable and meaningful it is for them to make the right actions; they are not happy about abiding the law; and they don't even feel proud of being good citizens. For MacIntyre, the practical reason of action should be not only legal, but also, and more importantly, a better principle in terms of ethics and good. Because an ethical and good-pursuing actor is necessarily an actor who makes moral reasoning based on practical reason before he acts. And yet how does A. MacIntyre make his claims? Why is his contention both rational and objective? That is exactly the topic of this paper. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。