查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- German Immigration Policy as Political Communication
- Communication, Negotiation and Conflict Resolution in Public Management Development
- 公共政策研究的新挑戰:國際新政經秩序之觀點
- 善用溝通談判技巧解決勞資爭議
- Lexical Density via Synchronous CMC in an EFL Debate Course: A Case Study
- 數位科技在國際企業建構知識經濟型溝通與談判之應用
- 觀察中共十八後與流亡組織的互動情勢探討
- 商務漢語教材之內容分析與建議
- Communication Strategies in English Debates
- 表情符號對線上採購談判和諧關係建立之影響--結合質化與量化分析
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | German Immigration Policy as Political Communication=政治溝通的德國移民政策 |
---|---|
作 者 | 陳奕儒; | 書刊名 | 臺灣國際研究季刊 |
卷 期 | 3:4 2007.冬[民96.冬] |
頁 次 | 頁217-259 |
分類號 | 574.43 |
關鍵詞 | 溝通; 辯論; 談判; 論述形構; Communication; Arguing; Bargaining; Discursive formations; |
語 文 | 英文(English) |
中文摘要 | 本文比較哈伯馬斯式及傅柯式的論述研究後,試圖提出一個以溝通過程爲焦點的政策制定研究框架。本框架由兩部分組成。首先,框架的第一部分探究了政策提議的緣由。政策提議反映了社會需求,而社會需求是應受威脅的社會認同而生,這些社會認同則是來自社會論述形構的複合體。再者,框架介紹兩種政治溝通的模式,包含「基理爲辯論」及「依權而談判」。研究者透過觀察這些政策提議是否參考相同的論述形構,而判斷政策間的互動究竟爲說之以理或威之以勢的溝通模式。藉此框架討論政策提議的起源及真切的溝通互動,可更得理解德國移民政策的成形。 |
英文摘要 | By comparing Habermasian and Foucaultian discourse studies; the thesis proposes a framework for studying policy-making with an emphasis on the communicative process. The framework composes two parts. First; it displays the derivation of policy proposals. The policy proposals reflect social needs; which derive from existential threats to different social identities; and these identities stem from the complex of social discursive formations. Secondly; two modes of political communicative interaction are introduced; including ”reason-oriented arguing” and ”power-oriented bargaining.” Researchers distinguish between reason-giving and power-manipulating manoeuvres by recognising whether the proposals share the same discursive formation as the reference pool. With a framework as such; German immigration policy is comprehensively studied both in terms of the origins of the policy proposals and of the actual communicative interaction. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。