查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- Semantic Differences between English Modal Auxiliaries and Semi-Modals
- Understanding the Importance of Collaborative Language Learning Process in Adult ESOL Classes
- The Connection between ASL Narration and English Writing in Deaf Students
- 無行為能力人之據實說明義務
- English Listening Comprehension Examinations: Proposed Evolution From Recognition to Understanding
- Relationships between Motivation/Attitude, Effort, and English Proficiency and Taiwan Technological University Students' English Learning Strategy Use
- 航管人員與飛行員對話的英語能力問題
- 交藻語專「大專英語能力測驗」結果分析報告
- Exclusive Target Language Use Vs. Partial Mother Tongue Use: Effect of the EFL Classroom Use on Students' Reading Proficiency
- 後半字式與前半字式克漏測驗在國中英語成就與能力測驗之應用
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | Semantic Differences between English Modal Auxiliaries and Semi-Modals=英語情態助動詞及半情態助動詞之語意差異 |
---|---|
作 者 | 李佩容; | 書刊名 | 玄奘人文學報 |
卷 期 | 7 2007.07[民96.07] |
頁 次 | 頁229-244 |
分類號 | 805.165 |
關鍵詞 | 語意差異; 英語; 情態助動詞; 半情態助動詞; 可能性; 能力; 義務; |
語 文 | 英文(English) |
中文摘要 | 本論文探詞英語情態助動詞如must, can, may, 以及其相對之半情態助動詞be certain to, have to, be likely to以及be able to之間的語意差異。本文認為epistemic情態助動詞如may(can)及must的語意含主觀性,並以說話者為導向;而半情態助動詞be likely to及be certain to的語意含客觀性,並以言談內容為導向。與‘能力’有關的概念如can及be able to之間語意的差異在於真實性(actuality),尤其用在過去時式更明顯。多數的情態助動詞都有語用功能,這是半情態助動詞所缺乏的。就句法分布來說,情態助動詞可以與半情態助動詞同時出現,但後者仍受制於選擇限制。只要不會造成語意上的謬誤及累贅,情態助動詞即可與語意上不相對的半情態動詞共同出現。 |
英文摘要 | This paper examines the semantic differences between English modal auxiliaries must, can, may, and semi-modals be certain to, have to, be likely to and be able to. It is proposed that the epistemic modals may (can) and must are subjective and speaker-oriented, while the semi-modals be likely to and be certain to are objective and discourse-oriented. Regarding the notion of 'ability, can and be able to differ mostly in actuality, especially in past tense. Most modals provide pragmatic usage, while semi-modals lack this function. In terms of syntactic distribution, semi-modals can co-occur with modals, yet they are subject to selective restriction. A modal selects a semi-modal with different modality to assure that the co-occurrence does not result in semantic anomaly or redundancy. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。