查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- Severe Bilateral Pneumothorax after Acupuncture: A Case Report with Literature Review
- 糖尿病併發症的中醫治療病例報告
- 針灸對中風後血管型失智症病人之效果評估:以全國性資料分析為例
- HELLP Syndrome with Antepartum Pulmonary Edema--A Case Report
- Ephedrine-Induced Complete Atrioventricular Block with Ventricular Asystole during Rapid Concomitant Phenytoin Infusion: A Case Report
- Epiglottic Hematoma Secondary to Endotracheal Intubation
- 臺灣地區慢性脊髓損傷病患排尿處置之調查報告
- 小兒使用TPN引起的併發症
- 以皮膚穴道電機能篩檢儀對婦科腫瘤病人治療前後及恢復期之觀察
- 針灸抑制癲癇發作機轉之研究
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | Severe Bilateral Pneumothorax after Acupuncture: A Case Report with Literature Review=針灸後嚴重雙側性氣胸:個案報告及文獻回顧 |
---|---|
作 者 | 葉兆斌; 周明智; 蔡銘祐; 邱永偉; 林怡芬; | 書刊名 | 中華民國急救加護醫學會雜誌 |
卷 期 | 18:2 2007.06[民96.06] |
頁 次 | 頁79-84 |
分類號 | 415.434 |
關鍵詞 | 針灸; 併發症; 雙側性氣胸; Acupuncture; Complications; Bilateral pueumothorax; |
語 文 | 英文(English) |
中文摘要 | 背景:急性闌尾炎是急性腹症手術中最常見的原因,但由於急性闌尾炎的不易診斷,使得誤診率及闌尾破裂率居高不下,本研究欲探究急性闌尾炎與異常尿液分析檢驗的相關性,以早期正確診斷急性闌尾炎並區別是否為破裂性闌尾炎。 方法:本研究採回溯性分析自2002年10月至2004年10月之中,714位於臨床診斷疑似急性闌尾炎而接受手術之病患,所有病患皆於術前作尿液分析檢驗,其中包括333位男性及381位女性,而根據病理切片報告,將所有病患分為三組,分別是正常闌尾,單純性闌尾炎(未破)及破裂性闌尾炎。 結果:我們依據病患的尿液分析檢驗報告,統計分析得到以下具有顯著意義的結果:急性闌尾炎的病患較正常闌尾的病患有較高百分比的陽性酮體反應,較高的比重及較低之酸鹼值。另外,破裂性闌尾炎的病患比單純性闌尾炎的病患有較高百分比的陽性酮體反應,陽性潛血反應,陽性白血球酯酶反應,較高的比重,較高的尿液白血球(大於五顆),較多的尿液紅血球及較低之酸鹼值。 結論:利用例行性的尿液分析檢驗可助於區別是否為單純性闌尾炎或破裂性闌尾炎,亦有助於臨床醫師了解急性闌尾炎病患的尿液分析結果。 |
英文摘要 | Objective: Acute appendicitis is the most common abdominal surgical emergency. The correlation between abnormal urinalysis and appendicitis is still unclear. Therefore, we aimed to determine whether routine urinalysis may serve as a tool to discriminate between acute appendicitis and perforated appendicitis. Methods: We analyzed retrospectively 714 patients with clinically suspected acute appendicitis who underwent urinalysis followed by appendectomy at the Changhua Christian Hospital, Taiwan, from 2003 to 2005. Urine test strip analysis was analyzed with the automated URISYS 2400. Results: Patients with acute appendicitis had a significantly higher percentage of positive urine ketone bodies (p=0.019), higher specific gravity (p=0.004) and lower urine pH (p=0.005) than patients with normal appendices. In addition, patients with perforated appendicitis had a significantly higher percentage of positive ketone bodies (p=0.003), positive occult blood (p=0.024), positive leukocyte esterase (p=0.003), higher positive white blood cell count (greater than 5/high power field) (p=0.010), higher specific gravity (p=0.003), higher red blood cell counts (p=0.002) and lower pH (p=0.002) than patients with non-perforated (simple) appendicitis. Conclusion: Routine urinalysis may show differences in findings between simple and perforated appendicitis. Clinically, we believe these urine parameters may aid clinicians in decision making for patients with suspected appendicitis. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。