查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- Using the Sociological Theory of Urbanism to Study Nelson Algren's Fictional World of the Existential Self in Chicago: A Comparison between Never Come Morning (1942) and the Man with the Golden Arm (1949)
- Naturalism in Epistemology
- Broadening the Concepts of Moore's Transactional Distance Theory in the Light of Relevant Adult Education Theories and the New Telecommunications Technologies
- 盧梭的自然主義與尼爾的夏山學校之教育觀的評析
- 西方自然主義之理論基礎
- 追尋與失落--論錢鍾書小說中的情感世界
- 斯賓塞的體育思想(1820-1903)
- 中國哲學史上的非實體思想
- 道德先驗主義與道德自然主義的抵牾與契合﹣﹣孟子人性論與荀子人性論之比較
- 疏離感的瞭解與處理
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | Using the Sociological Theory of Urbanism to Study Nelson Algren's Fictional World of the Existential Self in Chicago: A Comparison between Never Come Morning (1942) and the Man with the Golden Arm (1949)=以都市社會學的理論分析小說家納爾遜、艾爾格林 (Nelson Algren) 筆下的芝加哥:比較《明日不再來》與《金臂人》中存在的荒謬 |
---|---|
作 者 | 魯子青; | 書刊名 | 高雄應用科技大學學報 |
卷 期 | 36 2007.05[民96.05] |
頁 次 | 頁1-40 |
分類號 | 874.57 |
關鍵詞 | 找尋自我; 疏離; 芝加哥社會學派; 自然主義; 存在的荒謬; Self-hood; Grotesque; Sartrian anguish; Alienation; Existential absurdity; |
語 文 | 英文(English) |
中文摘要 | 1942年當納爾遜、艾爾格林發表了「早晨不再來」(Never Come Morning)以後,他被視為美國文壇的明日之星,不但受到海明威的高度讚譽,其後又被沙特翻譯成法文版。1949年他的另一鉅作「金臂人」(The Man with the Golden Arm)為他贏得了首屆的國家書卷獎(National Book Award)。本論文針對艾爾格林於四十年代僅發表的兩篇小說做深入 的內容分析(textual analysis),旨在探討艾氏對都市病理學(urban pathology)的關懷如何與當代的芝加哥社會學派相呼應。艾爾格林可能算是最早結合自然主義與存在主義的手法,去處理都市主題的美國小說家。自然主義(naturalism)或現代主義(modernism)和文學上的存在主義(literary existentialism)概念相去甚遠,由於它的風格本身就暗示著「守舊」之意,所以四十年代二戰前後成名的自然主義作家,在美國的文壇上一直難有清楚的定位。艾爾格林一向秉持著西奧多、.萊賽(Theodore Dreiser)以來的自然主義傳統,喜歡在文章中強調外在現實的必然性與社會抗議的必須性,尤其當他與一些法國存在主義大師結識後,他對被社會放逐的赤貧與遊民階級(lower depths)所遭受到的外在壓迫,以及他們情慾生命裡內在的焦慮有強烈的執著。他將自然主義的技巧與存在主義的荒謬視野巧妙結合,使都市主題的處裡顯得豐富且複雜。本論文所討論的兩篇作品中,作者大量探觸到人物內心最深沉的自我,這對存在主義社會學(existential sociology)的研究提供了最佳的文學範本。 |
英文摘要 | Early naturalism as a literary movement was primarily rooted in a positivist presumption that urban economy is controlled by the exploitative bourgeoisie who dominate the commercial and corporate business in a city. However, Nelson Algren (1909-1981) is the first naturalistic writer going beyond the adoption of organic elements such as myth and man’s consciousness in his depiction of the city force subsumed under the power of money. His novels are distinctly marked by a combination of determinism and existentialism,1 aiming to satirize the injustice pervading society where higher classes monopolized most of the resources. By his own account, he employs a sensuous audacity to accommodate the internal destructive forces with those coming from outside. After the combination between environmental forces and the internal horror, it seemed more unlikely for a character to make ethical choices in the chaotic and materialist universe.2 This paper thoroughly reviews two of the author’s best novels--Never Come Morning (1942) and The Man with the Golden Arm (1949) -- in which the theme of urban “deviant pathological phenomena” shows itself at great lengths in the main characters’ absurd existence. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。