頁籤選單縮合
題名 | Aristoteles' Politik und Platons Politikos=亞里斯多德的《政治學》和柏拉圖的《政治家》 |
---|---|
作者 | Ricken SJ., Friedo; |
期刊 | 哲學與文化 |
出版日期 | 20070500 |
卷期 | 34:5=396 2007.05[民96.05] |
頁次 | 頁75-94 |
分類號 | 141.5 |
語文 | eng |
關鍵詞 | 亞里斯多德; 政治學; 柏拉圖; 政治家; |
中文摘要 | 亞里斯多德的《政治學》在好幾個議題上,和柏拉圖的《政治學》有所爭論:第一,柏拉圖:世上只有一種統治的知識或專業技術;亞里斯多德:按照不同的結合形式,有不同的統治形式。第二,柏拉圖:正確的政體只有一種標準,就是統治者擁有專業知識;其他的政體都只是模仿而已。亞里斯多德:一共有三種正確的政體;標準在於政體是否以共同善為目標。第三,柏拉圖:法律是不完美的,因為無法為所有的情況伸張正義;理想的統治者比法律更優先。亞里斯多德:法律的權威是基於法律是獨立於主觀利益之外。第四,柏拉圖:統治人類的專家知識只有極少數的人才擁有;亞里斯多德強調眾人的常識。柏拉圖:國家是策術和目的的階級體系;亞里斯多德:所有公民都參與了國家的最終目的。第六,理想的政治家必須混合不同的特質;亞里斯多德主張貧富要均衡。 |
英文摘要 | In several issues, Aristotle’s Politics argues with Plato’s Politicus. 1.Platon: There is only one knowledge or expertise of ruling; Aristotle: There are, according to the different forms of associations, different forms of ruling. 2.Plato: The only criterion for the correct constitution is that the rulers possess expert knowledge; all the other constitutions are only imitations. Aristotle: There are three correct constitutions; the criterion is whether the constitution aims at the common good. 3.Plato: Law is imperfect because it cannot do justice to all circumstances; the ideal ruler is to be preferred to the law. Aristotle: The authority of the law is based not he fact that it is independent form subjective interests. 4.Plato: The expert knowledge of ruling human beings can be found in few people only; Aristotle stresses the common sense of the many. 5.Plato: The state is a hierarchy of arts and ends; Aristotle: all citizens participate in the final end of the state. 6.Plato: The ideal statesman has to interweave the different characters; Aristotle argues for a balance between the rich and the poor. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。