頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 國家與社會研究的再思考:以臺灣近代史為例=Rethinking State and Society in Modern Taiwanese Historiography |
---|---|
作 者 | 張隆志; | 書刊名 | 中央研究院近代史研究所集刊 |
卷 期 | 54 民95.12 |
頁 次 | 頁107-128 |
分類號 | 541.101 |
關鍵詞 | 國家; 社會; 臺灣近代史; 國家與社會研究; 臺灣近代史; 後殖民史學; State-society relations; Modern Taiwanese historiography; Post-colonial history; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本文為對於臺灣史學界國家與社會研究動向的學術反思。筆者介紹近代臺灣作為中國地方史、日本殖民地史及東亞區域史等三種不同研究取向,並以美國中國研究、臺灣現代化論爭與後殖民史學為例,討論臺灣近代國家與社會研究關於區域研究、歷史分期以及殖民現代性等重要課題與成果。國家與社會研究從源自歐洲歷史的概念範疇與分析架構,到其在東亞歷史的具體應用,先後受到社會科學及文化研究等理論典範的影響。研究者在問題意識上,從強調國家自主性與效能的制度論與行動者論,轉變為對於現代性與權力型態的文化分析。在方法取向上,則從現代國家建構與資本主義發展的比較研究,延伸至國族歷史敘事與文化帝國主義的論述分析。而近年來東亞學界對於比較殖民史和區域網絡等研究課題的重視,以及關於治理性與領域性等分析概念的討論,則使得學者更重視國家與社會關係的歷史性、空間性和社會文化特性,並反思應用西方理論典範的可能貢獻與限制。上述學術思潮及研究成果,將有助於歷史學者跳脫國家與社會二元概念與分析框架的限制,進而分析臺灣在全球、區域與在地空間面向中,各種政經、文化、族群、性別與階級問題的複雜動態。 |
英文摘要 | This review article examines recent research on state-society relations in modern Taiwanese historiography. The paper introduces three major research trends that respectively view Taiwan's modern experience as Chinese local history, as Japanese colonial history, and as East Asian regional history. Using the examples from U. S. China studies, the Taiwan Modernization debate, and post-colonial histories, I outline methodological issues that play out in area studies, periodization, and the concept of colonial modernity in the historical analysis of Taiwan's state-society relations. It is noteworthy that scholars have been influenced by different paradigms of social science and cultural studies. In addition to the institutional study of state capacity and autonomy, more attention has been directed toward cultural analysis of modern political power recently. And a new emphasis on cultural nationalism and comparative colonialism has also transformed scholarship on the development of the modern state and capitalism. With new conceptualizations of such questions as governmentatily and territoriality, researchers not only have become more sensitive to the historicity, spatiality, and social-cultural specificity of Taiwan's state-society relations, but now strive to overcome the dichotomy and Eurocentrism of conventional state-society scholarship with more dynamic frameworks of global, regional, and local networks and interactions. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。