頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 維持和平:歐安組織與北約的競爭抑或分工?=Peacekeeping: Competition or Distribution of Works between the OSCE and NATO? |
---|---|
作者姓名(中文) | 吳萬寶; | 書刊名 | 研究與動態 |
卷期 | 14 民95.07 |
頁次 | 頁59-88 |
分類號 | 578.1641 |
關鍵詞 | 歐安組織; 北約; 維持和平; 巴爾幹半島衝突; 道頓和平協定; OSCE; NATO; Peace-keeping; Balkan conflict; Dayton peace agreement; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 一般在討論後冷戰時期歐洲各國際組織的變遷與調適過程時,總是會以競爭來描述彼此之間對環境變化的反應和由此而來的自身改變。其中,又以歐安組織和北約的發展最為人所注目。面對歐洲安全情勢的變化,兩個組織雖有時間上的先後,但不約而同地皆以發展維持和平能力為調適的重點。歐安組織較早提出維持和平議題,卻因參與國的意見紛歧,而僅止於文件上的規範;相反地,北約因漸進式介入巴爾幹半島的衝突,而發展出維持和平能力,一躍成為歐洲最主要的安全組織。歐安組織與北約之間是否存在競爭關係,各有不同看法。重要的是,兩者的合作是確保歐洲和平不可或缺的要素。 |
英文摘要 | In discussion about the changes and adaptation process of the European organizations in the post-Cold War era the concept “competition” is used to describe the reactions and internal changes of the organizations to the circumstance. Among them, the internal changes of the OSCE and NATO are much more attractively. Due to the change of European security environment, peacekeeping become one of the focal points in internal discussions of both organizations. Although the Participating States of the OSCE address the issue of peacekeeping much early than the NATO, as a result of disputes about the OSCE should build its own capability of peacekeeping or not, peacekeeping eventually does not turn into practice; adversely, because the NATO is involved in Balkan conflicts progressively, it develops concept and capability of peacekeeping, and becomes the main security organization in the end. It is debatable whether there is a competition between the OSCE and NATO. It is true that cooperation between them is indispensable for securing the peace in European continent. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。