頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 楊日然的法理學研究與實踐法學--從碧海純一與卡爾.巴柏在分析哲學上的方法論談起=Zu-zan Yang's Practical Jurisprudence: Its Methodological Foundation of Junichi Aomi's and Karl Popper's Analytical Philosophy |
---|---|
作者 | 江玉林; Chiang, Yu-lin; |
期刊 | 政大法學評論 |
出版日期 | 20060600 |
卷期 | 91 民95.06 |
頁次 | 頁1-33 |
分類號 | 580.1 |
語文 | chi |
關鍵詞 | 法理學; 實踐法學; 分析哲學; 批判的理性主義; 楊日然; 碧海純一; 卡爾.巴柏; Jurisprudence; Practical jurisprudence; Analytical philosophy; Critical rationalism; Zu-zan Yang; Junichi Aomi; Karl Popper; |
中文摘要 | 楊日然在法理學上、或甚至是在法解釋學上的研究,毋寧是首先透過碧海純一在分析哲學上的引介,而在最後以巴柏在批判理性主義上的若干主張,作為他整個研究的基本取向。此一基本取向,正好成為楊日然後來在擔任大法官的時候,作為其從事憲法解釋在方法論上的基礎。本文認為,楊日然此一結合了法理學、法解釋學乃至於憲法解釋實務的整體論述軸線,一言以蔽之,即是一項可以稱之為邁向批判理性主義的實踐法學。 |
英文摘要 | Zu-zan Yang's studies on jurisprudence or legal dogmatics were originally based on Junichi Aoimi's concepts derived from analytical philosophy and ultimately oriented towards Karl Popper's opinions on critical rationalism. This integral point of view provided him with the methodological guidelines for his constitutional interpretations during his tenure as Justice. This article holds that Yang's integral arguments on jurisprudence, legal dogmatics and even constitutional interpretations might be understood as practical jurisprudence towards critical rationalism. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。