查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- Hannah Arendt on Banality of Evil
- 漢娜.鄂蘭的政治行動論
- 漢娜.鄂蘭(Hannah Arendt)的政治哲學方法論
- 從「轉型法院」到「常態法院」:論大法官釋字第二六一號與第四九九號解釋的解釋風格與轉型脈絡
- 崇高與美善的政治--評蔡英文著《政治實踐與公共空間--漢娜.鄂蘭的政治思想》
- 絕對坦誠的漢娜.鄂蘭[Hannah Arendt]
- 漢娜.鄂蘭[Hannah Arendt]--極權主義是政治之惡
- 評介瑪格麗德.卡諾凡[Margarete Canovan]《漢娜.鄂蘭政治思想的再解釋》[Hannah Arendt: A Reinterpretation of Her Political Thought]
- 轉型社會的民主、人權與法治--關於「轉型正義」的若干反思
- 臺灣轉型正義所面對的課題
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | Hannah Arendt on Banality of Evil=漢娜.鄂蘭論「平庸的惡」 |
---|---|
作 者 | 黃默; | 書刊名 | 東吳政治學報 |
卷 期 | 23 民95.09 |
頁 次 | 頁1-23 |
分類號 | 570.943 |
關鍵詞 | 漢娜.鄂蘭; 根本的惡; 平庸的惡; 艾希曼的審判; 轉型正義; Hannah Arendt; Radical evil; Banality of evil; Eichmann's trial; Transitional justice; |
語 文 | 英文(English) |
中文摘要 | Hannah Arendt是當代最具影響力的一位政治哲學家,她著作等身,關懷許多議題。這篇文章集中於她對「惡」的看法,具體來說,討論下列三個問題:一、Hannah Arendt採訪Eichmann在以色列法庭受審判經過的報導及其所引起的爭論;二、Hannah Arendt如何逐步放棄根本惡(radical evil)的概念,而提出「平庸的惡」(banality of evil)的看法?三、初步探討banality of evil的普遍性,引述台灣與南非的兩個案例作為說明。這篇文章並非針對Hannah Arendt政治思想整體的研究。 |
英文摘要 | This paper is primarily concerned with the controversy over the concept of “banality of evil” provoked by Hannah Arendt’s report from Jerlusalem on Eichmann’s trial. It will briefly describe Eichmann the man, the background to his trial and Arendt’s first impression of him. Then it will take up the criticisms of Arendt’s position and her explanation why she came to think of Eichmann and judge him as she did and how did she give up her commitment to the concept of “radical evil”. To support Arendt in her arguments, brief descriptions of torture and murder and their perpetrators from two different situations are cited. Finally, the paper will end with a brief reference to Arendt as a pariah. Never is this paper intended as a comprehensive study of Adrent’s political philosophy, which is obviously a different project. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。