查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 創造性問題解決教學方案對資優學生創造力及問題解決能力影響之研究
- 創造性問題解決方案對國小資優班與普通班學生創造性問題解決能力、創造力和問題解決能力之影響
- 創造性問題解決融入科學玩具製作教學對國小資優生創造力及科學創造性問題解決之研究
- 「問題本位學習」中資優兒童創造性問題解決能力的展現
- 國小自然科創造性問題解決教學效果之研究
- 創造性問題解決策略對增進資優幼兒創造力與問題解決能力之應用探討--以情意課程為例
- 創造性問題解決融入教學單元設計--以「創意美術用具收納盒」教學活動設計為例
- 立體裁剪設計應用創造性問題解決教學模式之探討
- 透過網路化創造性問題解決教學活動以培養國中生科技創造力之研究
- CPS教學對國小學生自然領域學習態度、創造力、後設認知與學習成就之影響
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 創造性問題解決教學方案對資優學生創造力及問題解決能力影響之研究=A Study on the Effects of the Creative Problem Solving Training Courses on Improving Creativity and Problem Solving Ability of Elementary Gifted Students |
---|---|
作者 | 江美惠; Chiang, Mei-hui; |
期刊 | 資優教育研究 |
出版日期 | 20051200 |
卷期 | 5:2 民94.12 |
頁次 | 頁83-106 |
分類號 | 529.61 |
語文 | chi |
關鍵詞 | 問題解決; 創造力; 創造性問題解決; 資優; Problem solving; Creativity; Creative problem solving; Giftedness; |
英文摘要 | The main purposes of this study were to design a creative thinking training course for 5th and 6th grade gifted students bases on Treffinger, Isaksen, & Droval (2000) "Creative Problem Solving" method, and to investigate the impacts of nine-time training course on creativity and problem solving ability of gifted students in the elementary school. A nonequivalent pretest-posttest experimental design was employed. The experimental group consisted of 34 studnents from eight elementary schools attended the cross districts gifted program. The control group consisted of 34 studnents from two Taipei Municipal elementary schools. The instruments are the New Creativity Test and the Test of Problem Solving (TOPS). The data were analyzed by one-way ANCOVA. The major finding of this study were concluded as follows: 1.The assessment results of t the New Creativity Test: The performances of the experimental group were significantly better than those of the control group in figure fluency, flexibility, originality, elaboration and in verbal fluency, flexibility, originality. Therefore, there was significant training effect on improving creativity of the experimental group. 2.The assessment results of the Test of Problem Solving(TOPS): The performances of the experimental group were significantly better than those of the control group in total scores and in the following subtests: explaining inferences and determining solutions. But no significant difference in the following subtests: determining causes. negative why questions and avoiding problems. Therefore, there was significant training effect on improving the problem solving ability of the experimental group. 3.The subjects reported that they enjoyed the training course. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。