查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 大法官釋字第五六三號「退學處分」解釋方法之評析=The Review of the Judicial Yuan Interpretation No. 563 |
---|---|
作 者 | 項程華; | 書刊名 | 僑光技術學院通觀洞識學報 |
卷 期 | 5 民95.05 |
頁 次 | 頁27-38 |
分類號 | 526.22 |
關鍵詞 | 基本權利; 受教權; 憲法解釋; Fundamental rights; Right to education; Constitutioanl interpretation; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 司法院公布了釋字五六三號解釋:「使成績未符一定標準或品行有重大偏差之學生予以退學處分,亦屬大學自治之範疇。」與三八二號解釋強調學生之受教權的重要大不相同。因此,究竟憲法保障之基本權利是否包含「受教權」,是本文討論的核心。本文針對「受教權」整理出各種學說,發現對「受教權」認知之混亂,問題在於傳統理論並未認識基本權利條款的特性:「成文化」及「開放性」的兩個特性。本文提出新的理論:以「保護範圍」的概念來解決以上問題,並發展出解釋方法上的新理論:「系統」與「系統錯誤」的觀念。最後針對釋字五六三號解釋的內容提出批評:「解釋邏輯」的問題缺失及「解釋方法」的錯誤,就基本權體系加以釐清「受教權」的功能及保護範圍。 |
英文摘要 | This study intends to explore if “right to education” is guaranteed by the Constitution in our country and, furthermore, tries to construct a new theoretical framework for clarifying the function and scope of protection of “right of education”. This paper reviews various theories with regard to “right to education” and finds a great diversity on this issue. According to the author, such a variety occurred because two characteristics of clause of fundamental rights--statutorization and openness--have rarely been emphasized in discussing “right to education”. Therefore, this paper tries to develop a new theory based upon the “scope of constitutional protection”. The “scope of constitutional protection” should accord with the scope of people's life. This concept leads to a new theory regarding interpretation method--“system” and “systematic fallacy”. Based upon the new theoretical framework, this paper criticizes the Judicial Yuan Interpretation No. 563 as defective in interpretational logic and interpretation method. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。