查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 團隊成員目標導向對於自我與集體效能及創新之影響--一個多層次研究
- 目標導向與創新行為--自我效能的中介角色與集權化的調節角色
- 國中生數學科學習之目標導向、社會比較、自我效能與課業壓力關係研究
- 高職工業類科教師集體效能對學生學習成效影響之研究:以學習自我效能為中介變項
- 新北市學前融合班教師集體效能感及其相關因素之研究
- 互動正義與員工創新行為:自我效能及主管部屬交換之干擾效果
- 高中師生自我效能、集體效能與學校效能研究模式之建立:自我效能中介效果、集體效能調節效果研究
- 國民中學學生之自我效能、目標導向與身心健康模式建構與驗證
- Four Kinds of Goal Orientations and Their Implications on English Learning and Teaching
- 解析個人層次的教師集體效能感、組織層次的教師集體效能感與教師自我效能感的關係
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 團隊成員目標導向對於自我與集體效能及創新之影響--一個多層次研究=The Effect of Team Member Goal Orientation on Self-efficacy, Collective Efficacy and Innovation: A Multilevel Study |
---|---|
作 者 | 黃家齊; 黃荷婷; | 書刊名 | 管理學報 |
卷 期 | 23:3 民95.06 |
頁 次 | 頁327-346 |
分類號 | 494.201317 |
關鍵詞 | 目標導向; 自我效能; 集體效能; 創新行為; 創新績效; 多層次研究; Goal orientation; Self-efficacy; Collective efficacy; Innovative behavior; Innovation performance; Multilevel study; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本研究主題探討目標導向在團隊工作情境下的可能影響,推導並實證了一個包含個人與團隊層次的多層次中介模式。在個人層次欲了解個人目標導向、自我效能與創新行為的關係,在團隊層次則欲了解團隊目標導向、集體效能與創新績效的關聯性。經蒐集53個團隊資料,以LISREL進行分析結果發現個人層次理論模式研究結果與過去研究類似,個人學習導向與自我效能及創新行為間有正相關,且自我效能在此關係中扮演了中介變項的角色,個人表現導向與自我效能及創新行為之關係則均不顯著。團隊層次模式研究結果則與個人層次模式不同,團隊學習導向與集體效能及創新績效均無顯著相關,而相對的,團隊表現導向則與集體效能及創新績效均呈顯著負相關。研究結果亦突顯了團隊目標導向研究及多層次研究的必要性。 |
英文摘要 | Goal orientation theory originated in the educational psychology and child development literature. It conceptualized the broader goals pursued by individuals as a personality dimension and proposed that individuals have goal orientations preferences in achievement situation. Though previous studies had proved the proposition of goal orientation has important impact on individual performance. Hat' goal orientation affects innovative behavior is still unclear Moreover if we consider the team work situation, the impact of team member goal orientation on individual innovative behavior and team innovation performance is an unexplored issue especially. This is also the theoretical gap the present study hope to contribute. In this study, we explored the effect of goal orientation trait under team work situations. We developed and testified a multilevel model. At individual level, we examined the relationship between individual goal orientation and innovative behavior and the mediating role of self-efficacy. At group level, we also examined the relationship between team goal orientation and innovation performance, and the mediating role of collective efficacy. 70 R & D teams from 36 firms were recruited to participate in the study. To be included in the final sample, at least 2/3 employees in the R & D team had to complete α survey and their supervisor had to complete another survey. 70 sets (including 490 employees) were distributed and 56 sets (including 228 employees) were collected. However 3 sets were excluded as α result of its response rate under 2/3, compared with the number of the team members. Thus, 53 R & D teams (including 218 employees) were included in the data analysis. We used LISREL to analyze data and examined our hypotheses. The results showed that individual level analysis were consistent with previous researches. Learning orientation was positively related to innovative behavior and self-efficacy mediated this relationship, whereas performance orientation showed no significant relationship with self-efficacy and innovative behavior Results of group level analysis were different. Team learning orientation had no significant relationships with either collective efficacy or innovation performance, whereas team performance orientation had significantly negative relationships with collective efficacy and innovation performance. These results implied learning orientation dominated the impact on self-efficacy and innovative behavior at individual level, whereas team performance orientation dominated the impact on collective-efficacy and innovation performance at team level. These findings highlighted the necessity of study on team goal orientation and multilevel model. The implication of these findings for theory and research on goal orientation in teams and team staffing are also discussed. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。