查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 老人之健康相關生活品質評估
- Exploration into the Variance in Self-Reported Health-Related Quality of Life between the Chronically-Ill Elderly and their Family Caregivers
- 血液透析病之健康相關生活品質問卷的設計與驗證
- 如何編製一份問卷:以「健康相關生活品質」問卷為例
- 廿一世紀之健康照護效性評量:生活品質與生活品質調整後之存活分析
- 簡介與評論常用的一般性健康相關生活品質量表兼談對未來研究的建議
- Postoperative 6-Month and 1-Year Evaluation of Health-Related Quality of Life in Total Hip Replacement Patients
- 膝部骨性關節炎醫療照護成效量表之發展
- Physical Functioning and Health-Related Quality of Life: Before and after Total Hip Replacement
- 健康相關生活品質概念與測量原理之簡介
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 老人之健康相關生活品質評估=Assessment the Health-related Quality of Life in the Elderly |
---|---|
作 者 | 楊慎絢; 黃芬芬; 莊美幸; 李志清; | 書刊名 | 北市醫學雜誌 |
卷 期 | 3:7 民95.07 |
頁 次 | 頁693-701 |
分類號 | 412.86 |
關鍵詞 | 臺灣簡明版世界衛生組織生活品質問卷; 健康相關生活品質; 等級評分; WHOQOL-BREF; Taiwan; Health-related quality of life; Rating scale; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 目的:以「臺灣簡明版世界衛生組織生活品質問卷」(WHOQOL-BREF Taiwan Version)評估健檢老人之健康相關生活品質(health-related quality of life,HRQL),並分析年齡、心理、生理、社會、環境各範疇的影響程度。方法:以某區域醫院的健郃老年人為對象,問卷第一部份有28個選擇題,請受訪者評估自己的生活品質,內容包括生理、心理、社會、環境四大範疇,以及整體評估(G1、G2);第二部份以「等級評分」(rating scale)綜合自評整體的生活品質(Total quality of life,Total QOL)。再以SPSS 11.0統計軟體分析。結果:2005年9月共有51位健檢老年人接受評估,男性32位、女性19位。年齡平均為72.9 (±8.9)歲、慢性病數平均1.6(±0.7)個。生理、心理、社會、環境四大範疇評分之平均值分別為13.04(±2.28)、12.25(±1.98)、12.52(±1.68)、13.52(±1.65);另有兩題為生活品質的整體評估(G1、G2),平均值分別為12.64(±2.81)、12.00(±3.49)。整體生活品質評分(total QOL)平均值為71.27(±12.80)。各大範疇檢測項目內容效度(content validity)之相關係數分別為0.61-0.44、0.80-0.46、0.57-0.52、0.54-0.40 (p<0.01);四大範疇各項目總相關係數為0.42-0.35 (p<0.05)。在預測效度部分,環境範疇對生活品質整體評估(G1)的迴歸係數為0.666,達到統計的顯著性(p<0.05)。結論:本研究僅初步評估健檢儘人之健康相關生活品質,以及心理、生理、社會、環境各範疇的影響程度。未來仍需進一步比較老年人之慢性病的生活品質,才能夠更精確估算出老化或疾病造成健康的失能。 |
英文摘要 | Background and Purpose: the WHOQOL-BREF Taiwan Version questionnaire was used to assess the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and the effects of age together with the physical, psychological, social, environmental domains for an elderly population. Methods: The questionnaire contains 28 items related to physical, psychological, social, environmental domains, general health (G1, G2), and a rating scale foe total quality of life (Total QOL). The dataset was collected randomly during a health examination of an elderly population a local hospital and analyzed with SPSS 11.0. Results: Fifty-one elderly people completed the questionnaire during September 2005 and these were made up of, 32 males and, 19 females with a mean age of 72.9±8.9 years. The subjects were suffering from a mean of 1.6±0.9 chronic diseases and had a score for the physical, psychological, social and environmental domains of 13.04±2.28, 12.25±1.98, 12.52±1.68 and 13.52±1.65 points respectively. The scores for the two general items (G1, G2) were means of 12.64±2.81 and 12.00±3.49 points, respectively. The mean score for the total QOL (score 0-100) was 71.27±12.80 points. Content validity coefficients for the four domains were 0.61-0.44, 0.80-0.46, 0.57-0.52 and, 0.54-0.40 for item-domain correlation (p<0.01) and 0.42-0.35 for inter-domain correlation (p<0.05). The environmental domain was found to be a significant predictor for total quality of life in our study. Conclusion: This study initially appraised the QOL relating to the physical, psychological, social and environmental domains of elderly persons attending a health examination. Further comparisons of the QOL and its relationship to chronic disease among the elderly are necessary in order to assess the loss of health attributable to either age or illness. (Full Text in Chinese) |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。