查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 整合審查機制簡化學校教科書評選規準之研究=A Study on the Simplification of Evaluation and Selection Criteria for School Textbooks through the Integrated Textbook Evaluation System |
---|---|
作者 | 賴光真; | 書刊名 | 國立編譯館館刊 |
卷期 | 34:3 民95.09 |
頁次 | 頁3-12 |
分類號 | 521.8 |
關鍵詞 | 教科書; 評選規準; 學校本位; Textbooks; Evaluation and selection criteria; School-based; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 學校層級的教科書評選規準普遍有規準項目過多的問題,導致教科書評選發生困難阻窒,信度與效度備受質疑。本研究認為可以整合審查機制來簡化學校層級教科書評選規準項目數。主要策略是透過「專屬審查—審選兼顧—專屬評選—審選均略」、「全國普遍—學校個殊」、「過程考量—後續考量」以及「篩選性規準—比較性規準」等指標,進行規準權責的區隔以及層次的劃分。 本研究以國小國語教科書為例,採取「Delphi問卷調查」及「焦點團體座談諮詢」,邀請學者專家、研究生,以及國小教師參與規準屬性判斷、AHP權重設定,以及意見回饋等。研究結果發現,參與者認為學校評選應保留檢視之項目,計有11項。其中8項評選過程應考量之項目,依據權重排序分別為:「能具備語文的與生活的實用價值」(權重值22%)、「概念難易與情節主題符合學生身心發展與經驗」(18%)、「教學活動設計能為師生所適應或接受」(16%)、「能提供或提示教學參考資料」(12%)、「寫作良好能易於閱讀理解」(9%)、「能提供或提示練習材料或活動」(8%)、「教學活動設計能在環境條件下實施」(8%)、「能多元開放而避免偏見」(7%)。另外,「能提供更換或維護服務」、「售價能合理」、「配送能迅速準時」等3項,則為教科書評選過程之外另行考量項目。 本研究研訂出來的評選規準,較目前多數學校所用更為精簡,並且有理論與實證研究的基礎,應能提升教師使用意願。更重要的是,本研究所採取的規準項目簡化策略,應可提供其他領域或學科,做為檢討修訂教科書評選規準之參考。 |
英文摘要 | It is commonly believed that the excessive criteria for the evaluation and selection of textbooks at school levels have caused increasing difficulty in the related tasks, which in turn have adversely affected the efficiency and reliability of the criteria. The purpose of this study is to investigate the feasibility of reducing the number of criteria for the evaluation and selection of school textbooks through an integration of the textbook evaluation and selection systems. The key approach that used in this study is to work on the segregation of responsibilities and review/selection levels, through the indicators such as“For review only-For both review and selection-For selection only-For neither review nor selection”,“Nationwide criteria-School-specific criteria”, “Consideration in the evaluation process-Consideration in follow-up evaluation process”, “For eliminate unsuitable textbook-For select suitable textbook”, etc. The evaluation and selection criteria for the Chinese language textbook of elementary schools as an example in this study. Through the“Delphi Questionnaires”and“Focus Group”approaches, those participated in this study-scholars, experts, graduate students and elementary school teachers-determine the nature of the criteria, set weightings in AHP method and provide extensive feedback. The findings are as follow: A total of eleven items have been reckoned by the participants as items which should be retained by schools for the evaluation and selection, including eight items which should be considered in the evaluation process. These items are listed below in accordance with their weightings: -Whether the textbook presents practical value in terms of language learning and competencies for life (22%). -Whether the themes, scenario, and the conceptual difficulties contained in the textbook are suitable for the physical and psychological development of the students as well as their life experience (18%). -Whether the activities design relating to the textbook are well-acceptable and adaptable to the teachers and students (16%). -Whether the textbook provides additional reference material (12%). -Whether the textbook is written in a style which is sufficiently friendly for the students (9%). -Whether the textbook provides additional material or activities for practice (8%). -Whether the teaching activities are designed in a way that they can be implemented under school’s environmental conditions (8%). -Whether the textbook is written in open mind and diversified viewpoints, thereby avoiding prejudices (7%). Apart from the above, there are also three criteria to be considered in follow-up evaluation process: -Whether the service of replacement or maintenance available. -Whether the price of textbook acceptable. -Whether the textbooks distribute punctually. The criteria established as a result of this study are found to be more precise and simple than the ones currently adopted by most of the schools. Backed with theories and empirical research, the new criteria are believed to be more motivating to teachers. More importantly, the approaches used in simplifying the evaluation and selection criteria can be served as a good reference to improve of the criteria for school textbooks of other subjects or areas. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。