查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- Are There Dangling Topics in Mandarin Chinses?
- A Study of Topical Structure and Writing Quality
- A Comparative Text Analysis of Thematic Progression and Coherence
- Topical Structure Analysis of the News Leads in the Philippine English and the Taiwanese English
- 從美國醫師考試制度談我國醫師考試之改進
- 從篇章分析的角度探究大學心理、管理和經濟學原文教科書特定篇章之可讀性
- Text Analysis in Translation Practice: An Approach Through M. A. K. Halliday's Functional Grammar
- 大學生物、化學和電腦科學原文教科書特定篇章之質性研究
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | Are There Dangling Topics in Mandarin Chinses?=漢語裡有孤懸主題嗎? |
---|---|
作者 | 黃瑞恆; 丁仁; | 書刊名 | Concentric: Studies in Linguistics |
卷期 | 32:1 民95.01 |
頁次 | 頁119-146 |
分類號 | 802.6 |
關鍵詞 | 主題結構; 孤懸主題; 句法鏈; A項移位; Topic construction; Dangling topic; Subject in Chinese; PP-reduced form; |
語文 | 英文(English) |
中文摘要 | 本文旨在探討漢語裡是否存在孤懸主題(dangling topics),俗稱 漢語式主題(Chinese-style topics)。反對者認為,所有的漢語主題皆 透過句法鏈(chain formation)或A 槓移位(A’-movement),因而與 緊隨的評論句(comment clause)產生依附關係(dependency),獲得 形式認可 (syntactically licensed)。反之,贊成者則主張,漢語裡有 某些主題,也就是孤懸主題,是經由語意認可(semantically licensed) 的,與形式無關。比較兩造分析之後,本文反駁語意認可的論點,同 時修正形式認可分析中的一些缺點,總之,我們認為漢語裡並不存在 孤懸主題。 |
英文摘要 | This paper compares two opposing views as to whether dangling topics exist in Mandarin Chinese. The non-dangling-topic analysis considers all Chinese topics syntactically licensed by chain formation or A’-movement, while the dangling-topic analysis treats some Chinese topics (i.e. dangling topics) as semantically rather than syntactically licensed. Rejecting the semantic licensing of topics, this paper argues in favor of the non-dangling-topic approach but meanwhile fixes some problems that may arise under this approach. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。