查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 儒家義利之辨與“經濟人”假設=The Confucian Viewpoint on Rightneous and Personal Interests and the Hypothesis of Rational-economic Man |
---|---|
作 者 | 邵漢明; 王永平; | 書刊名 | 儒教文化研究 |
卷 期 | 6 民95.02 |
頁 次 | 頁215-228 |
分類號 | 121.2 |
關鍵詞 | 先秦儒家; 義利觀; 市場經濟; 經濟人; Ex-qin confucianism; Value on the pursuit of personal loyalty and material benefit; Market economy; Rational-economic man; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 長期以來,有一種頗為流行的觀點認為,儒家重義輕利,並把這種“重義輕利”的傳統看作是向現代化邁進的歷史包袱。本文考察了先秦儒家原典,認為先秦儒家的代表人物都不排斥“利”,相反,對個人正當的物質利益追求給予充分肯定。儒家講“以義節利”,不是要以“義”排斥和否定“利”,而是防止個人自私自利之心的惡性膨脹,導致人與人之間的爭鬥,造成社會的動亂,最終導致全體社會成皆不利的局面。先秦儒家並不認為“義”與“利”是完全衝突的,逐利就一定不願仁義,講仁義就一定要放棄逐利,二者不可兼得。而是認為“利”和“義”是可以統一的。統一的前提條件就是“先義後利”。先秦儒家義利並重,先義後利的思想,正是我們建設有中國特色的社會主義市場經濟可資利用的本土文化資源之一。 |
英文摘要 | It has been very popular for a long time that some people thought that Confucian philosophy attached too much importance to personal loyalty and fought against or even opposed to one’s material benefit, and meanwhile considered the tendency that Confucian philosophy weighed higher personal loyalty than material benefit as a historical obstacle to the process of modernization. In this article, the author investigated the originality of Confucian philosophy and thought that none of the Confucian thinkers repulsed material benefit. On the contrary, Confucian philosophers thought much of personal pursuit of material benefit. The Confucian idea about “much loyalty, less benefit” does not mean denying the pursuit of personal benefit. In fact, they insisted the harmony instead of the total collision between the pursuit of personal loyalty and material benefit. The prerequisite of their unification was “personal loyalty prior to material pursuit”. This kind of Confucian standpoint on “one’s pursuit of personal loyalty superior to material benefit” is one of the native cultural resources that should be taken full advantage of in our construction of the socialist market economy. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。