頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 從《郭店.老子甲》「絕智棄辯」章探析《老子》相關思想之詮釋發展=The Analysis of the Doctrines of Lao Tzu from the Chapter "Chueh-chih-chi-pien (絕智棄辯) " of Guodian Zhujian of Lao Tzu |
---|---|
作者姓名(中文) | 鄭倩琳; | 書刊名 | 國文學報 |
卷期 | 39 民95.06 |
頁次 | 頁81-109 |
分類號 | 121.31 |
關鍵詞 | 郭店老子; 絕智棄辯; 絕□棄□; 絕聖棄智; 絕仁棄義; 儒道會通; Guodian Zhujian of Lao Tzu; Chueh-chih-chi-pien; Chueh-wei-chi-lu; Chueh-sheng-chi-chih; Chueh-jen-chi-yi; Mergence between confucianism and Taoism; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 今本《老子.十九章》有「絕聖棄智」、「絕仁棄義」之句,然而,郭店《老子.甲本》簡1卻寫作「絕智棄辯」、「絕(為心)棄(虘心)」。針對此一論題,論者多認為:從「絕智棄辯」、「絕(為心)棄(虘心)」到「絕聖棄智」、「絕仁棄義」的文字變化,乃是道家後學為因應其與儒墨相爭的局勢,而作出的「篡改」。然而,這樣的說法看似合理,卻未必周延。在本篇論文中,筆者將重新檢視此一問題,以探究「絕聖」、「絕仁棄義」等論題之所以被提出的機緣,並逐一論證老子復學其實並未違背早期《老子》思想的本意。再者,正因郭店本《老子》沒有「絕聖」、「絕仁棄義」等說法,是以論者多據此抒發儒道兩家相融互通之論,筆者在本文中亦將探析此處「儒道會通」的意涵與層次。 |
英文摘要 | There were such lines “chueh-sheng-chi-chih”, “chueh-jen-chi-yi” appeared in the chapter 19th of Lao Tzu; however, in Guodian Zhujian of Lao Tzu, it wrote “chueh-chih-chi-pien”, “chueh-wei-chi-lu”. According to many researchers, the literal change from “chueh-chih-chi-pien” “chueh-wei-chi-lu” to “chueh-sheng-chi-chih”, “chueh-jen-chi-yi” resulted from the competition between the sects of Taoism and Confucianism. Nevertheless, this viewpoint was anything but thoughtfulness. As a result, this researcher tries to re-investigate the reasons why issues such as “chueh-sheng”, “chueh-jen-chi-yi” were raised so as to clarify the sect of Taoism didn't violate the early doctrines of Lao Tzu. In addition, there were no such sayings of “chueh-sheng”, “chueh-jen-chi-yi” in Guodian Zhujian of Lao Tzu, so other researchers made an interpretation of mergence between Confucianism and Taoism. This researcher will later analyze the meaning of the above mergence. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。