查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 社會脈絡、個人網絡與臺灣2004年立法委員選舉選民的投票抉擇
- 2020年總統選舉客家族群改投給蔡英文嗎?客庄與非客庄的分野
- Political Party Supporters in Hong Kong Elections
- 選民投票抉擇階段情境及策略變化對選舉預測之影響--以1998年臺南市立法委員選舉為例
- 「期望地位」對同儕互動的影響分析
- 評丁仁傑著《社會脈絡中的助人行為:臺灣佛教慈濟功德會個案研究》 (臺北市:聯經,1999)
- 網路人口的樣本特性:比較網頁調查追蹤方法與個人網絡抽樣方法
- 在地化風險之實踐與理論缺口--遲滯型高科技風險社會
- 藍與綠--臺灣選民的政治意識型態初探
- Types of Learning Experience of Adult Learners
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 社會脈絡、個人網絡與臺灣2004年立法委員選舉選民的投票抉擇=Social Context, Individual Network on Vote Choice: A Study of the 2004 Legislative Elections in Taiwan |
---|---|
作 者 | 張佑宗; 趙珮如; | 書刊名 | 臺灣民主季刊 |
卷 期 | 3:2 民95.06 |
頁 次 | 頁1-38 |
專 輯 | 2004年臺灣立法委員選舉 |
分類號 | 573.3 |
關鍵詞 | 社會脈絡; 個人網絡; 2004年立委選舉; 投票抉擇; Social context; Individual network; Vote choice; The 2004 legislative elections in Taiwan; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本文研究結果發現,在控制選民政黨認同的條件下,認同泛藍陣營的選民,如個人與家庭其他人的政治立場不一樣,比起那些家庭內成員的政治立場一樣,或是家庭內成員的政治立場都不一樣的人,最後把票投給泛藍陣營的比率最低(69.6%)。在家庭成員的壓力下,他們也沒把票投給泛綠陣營,而是有部份的人選擇不去投票(26.1%)。認同泛綠陣營的選民,如個人與家庭其他人的政治立場不一致,比起那些家庭內成員的政治立場一致,或是家庭內成員的政治立場都不一致的人,最後把票投給泛綠陣營的比率也是最低(47.1%)。在家庭成員的壓力下,他們也沒把票投給泛藍陣營,而是有高達47.1%的人選擇不去投票。透過Logistic 迴歸模型的分析,政黨認同仍是影響選民投票抉擇最重要的因素,不管是泛藍或泛綠的認同者,居住在其支持陣營較弱勢的地區,最後投給其所認同陣營的比率高於同樣認同其陣營,但居住在其陣營得票率較高的村里。在控制地理區域下,政黨認同仍是影響選民投票抉擇最重要的因素,居住在北部的選民,教育程度越高,越支持泛藍陣營;年紀越低,越支持泛綠陣營。 |
英文摘要 | Using a sociological research approach, we find that, controlling for party identification, those identifying with the pan-blue camp whose political position differed from those of all their family members voted for the pan-blue camp less (69.6%) than either those whose position was the same as all of their family members or those whose position agreed with those of some family members but not with others. Under pressure from their families, many of these voters did not necessarily vote for the pan-green camp, but instead decided not to vote (26.1%). Likewise, those identifying with the pan-green camp whose political position differed from those of all their family members also voted for the pan-green camp less (47.1%) than either those whose position was the same as all of their family members or those whose position agreed with those of some family members but not others. A high percentage of these voters (47.1%) also decided not to vote, under pressure from their families. Using logistic regression find that party-identification was the most important factor influencing voter choice, and independence/unification position was the second most important. Interestingly, regardless of whether identifying with the pan-blue or pan-green camp, voters living in districts in which support for their camp is weak tend to vote for their own camp more often than those living in districts in which support for their camp is strong. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。