查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 聯合國行政法院審查機制有關問題之研究=The Jurisprudence and Jurisdiction of the United Nations Administrative Tribunal |
---|---|
作 者 | 葉錦鴻; | 書刊名 | 臺灣國際法季刊 |
卷 期 | 2:3 民94.09 |
頁 次 | 頁151-200 |
分類號 | 578.14 |
關鍵詞 | 國際公務員; 聯合國行政法院; 聯合國職員規章與規則; 裁量權; International civil servant; United nations administrative tribunal; Staff regulations and rules of the united nations; Discretionary power; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 根據聯合國憲章以及職員章程、規則,聯合國秘書處職員的勤務良窳是由秘書長裁量而做成決定;若考慮聯合國國際組織內部人事職務的特殊陸及專門技術性,則行政上如此規定亦是無可厚非,但若秘書長被賦予的權限過於擴大的話,這種自由的權力亦有被濫用之虞,因此,在制度上正當地約束秘書長,對於維護職員的權利有著相當重要的關係。一九四九年新設的聯合國行政法院(United Nations Administrative Tribunal)是唯一能制衡秘書長裁量權的機關,本文希望藉由整理分析聯合國行政法院判例,以了解該法院的管轄與運作狀況,進而探討其如何審查聯合國秘書長的行政裁量。本文將其具體分為(1)事實審查、(2)動機審查、(3)內容審查、(4)程序審查等,逐一探討之。 |
英文摘要 | According to the Charter of the United Nations and its staff regulation, the Sectary-General has the discretionary power to decide the merits and ability of the staff of the Secretariat. This kind of regulations is reasonable if the specialty and technicality of the staff of the United Nations is taken into consideration. However, if too much discretionary power has been authorized to the Sectary-General, the power could be abused. Therefore, in order to protect the rights of the staff, it is important to have an institution to limit the power of the Sectary-General. The United Nations Administrative Tribunal, established in 1949, is the only organ which could balance the discretionary power of the Sectary-General. This article hopes, through analyzing the cases of United Nations Administrative Tribunal, to understand how the Tribunal reviews the administrative acts based on the discretion. This article categorizes the Tribunal's review into four parts: (1) the review of facts; (2) the review of motive; (3) the review of contents; (4) the review of procedure. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。